green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of One Hundred Forty-Five Thousand, One Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars
But see United States v. Lizza Indus., Inc., 775 F.2d 492, 498-99 (2d Cir.1985) (eighth amendment not violated even where some of profits forfeited could have been made legally), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Ribas Dominicci
In contrast, the government relies, as it did unsuccessfully in Hartec , on the rationale of In re American Pouch Foods, Inc., 769 F.2d 1190 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 *45 (1986), where the Seventh Circuit held in a bankruptcy ease that the title vesting clause gives the government “absolute title” to property acquired with funds derived from progress payments made by the government.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bradshaw
(2×)
See State v. Hutchings, 950 P.2d at 433, 435 (holding that "`the liable "person" and the "enterprise" can be the same entity'" under subsections (1) and (2) of section 76-10-1603) (quoting United States v. DiCaro, 772 F.2d 1314, 1320 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hurley
See United States v. Lizza Indus., Inc., 775 F.2d 492, 497-99 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Hurley, United States of America v. Carlo Demarco, United States of America v. James Saccoccio, United States of America v. Stanley Cirella, United States of America v. Kenneth Saccoccio, United States of America v. Stephen Pizzo, United States of America v. Donna Saccoccia, United States of America v. Anthony Demarco
See United States v. Lizza Indus., Inc., 775 F.2d 492, 497-99 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986). 108 The more difficult question is whether property should be regarded as "obtained" by the money launderer when it has merely been held in custody by that individual and has been passed along to its true owner.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Matthew Wayne Tome
See United States v. DiCaro, 772 F.2d 1314, 1325 (7th Cir.1985) (citing Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 86 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 218 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boettger v. Miklich
(2×)
Accord Scott v. United States, 573 F.Supp. 622 (M.D.Tenn.1983), rev'd on other grounds, Resha v. United States, 767 F.2d 285 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986). [7] See also In re Spinelli, 212 N.J.Super. 526 , 515 A.2d 825 (1986) wherein the court, in construing New Jersey's counterpart to the Act, held that disclosure to "investigative or law enforcement officers" is authorized only to the limited class of individuals defined in the act as "investigative or law enforcement officers" under a strict construction similar to that made herein. *14…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Freidus
See In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Issued to Thirteen Corps., 775 F.2d 43, 48 (2d Cir.), cert, den., Roe v. United States, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1985) (“Roe”) (“if one of [the witness’] relatives or associates complies with the subpoena, any information obtained from [the witness] would not have been extracted under an order compelling him to testify”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ofchinick
See United States v. Lizza Industries, Inc., 775 F.2d 492, 497-99 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ofchinick
See United States v. Lizza Industries, Inc., 775 F.2d 492, 497-99 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Siebers v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In re Dittmer)
See In re American Pouch Foods, 769 F.2d 1190 (7th Cir.1985) cert. den. 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed. 2d 716 , and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel W. O'connell, A/K/A Edward Smith, United States of America v. Gregory J. Cooke, United States of America v. Patrick Basil Collier, United States of America v. William R. Patterson, Ii, United States of America v. Richard Allen St. Cyr, A/K/A Dexter
See Resha v. United States, 767 F.2d 285, 287-89 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. O'Connell
See Resha v. United States, 767 F.2d 285, 287-89 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Weinberg
See United States v. DiCaro, 772 F.2d 1314, 1319-20 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986); see also Bennett v. United States Trust Co., 770 F.2d 308, 315 (2d Cir.1985) (corporate entity may not be simultaneously the “enterprise” and the “person”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 800 , 88 L.Ed.2d 776 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wagner v. United States
See American Acceptance Corp. v. Glendora Better Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 1220 , 1223 (9th Cir.1977); see also Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299, 304-05 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986); Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1487, 1489-90 (9th Cir.1983) (levy operates as a seizure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome Hadley
(2×)
On direct examination by defense counsel at Defendant’s sentencing hearing, Mrs. Hadley expressly acknowledged having testified before the grand jury that she had seen Defendant with a gun, but she explained that she had merely “felt” an object and “just assumed that’s what it was.” (3/21/2003 Sentencing Hearing Tr. at 17-18, J.A. at 99-100.) Mrs. Hadleyfurther testified that she could not “remember what I said” in her grand jury testimony, blaming this memory loss on her .use of Prozac. {Id. at 17, J.A. at 99.) As this and other courts have held under analogous facts, such lim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Neil v. Robinson (In Re Pappas)
See also In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 775 F.2d 43, 46 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986) (applying Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 to determined whether subpoenas were properly served to two corporations).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Perkins v. United States
See also, Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See, e.g., Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Capozzoli v. Tracey, 663 F.2d 654 (5th Cir. 1981); Morris v. United States, 521 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1975); Scott v. Internal Revenue Service, 622 F. Supp. 537 (E.D.Tenn. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Driskill v. State
See, e.g., Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Capozzoli v. Tracey, 663 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1981); Morris v. United States, 521 F.2d 872 (9th Cir.1975); Scott v. Internal Revenue Service, 622 F.Supp. 537 (E.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383
See also Resha v. United States, 767 F.2d 285, 288 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d 838, 855 (3d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America (Internal Revenue Service), Creditor-Appellant v. Louis George Barbier, Ruth Dean Barbier, Debtors-Appellees
See American Acceptance Corp. v. Glendora Better Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.1977); see also Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299, 304-05 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986); Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1487, 1489-90 (9th Cir.1983) (levy operates as a seizure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lindberg Corporation, D/B/A Harris Metals
Such property, for the most obvious reasons of public policy, cannot be seized by authority of another sovereignty against the consent of the Government.’ ” Armstrong, 364 U.S. at 43 , 80 S.Ct. at 1565 -66 (quoting United States v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co., 218 U.S. 452, 471 , 31 S.Ct. 49, 54 , 54 L.Ed. 1107 (1910)); see also In re American Pouch Foods, Inc., 769 F.2d 1190 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coated Sales, Inc. v. Highland Industries, Inc. (In Re Coated Sales, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re American Pouch Foods, Inc., 769 F.2d 1190 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082 , 106 S.Ct. 1459 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986) aff'g 30 B.R. 1015 (D.D.C.1983); In re Double H Products, 462 F.2d 52 (3rd Cir.1972); In re Wincom Corp., 76 B.R. 1 (Bankr.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorothy E. Snodgrass v. United States
See, e.g., Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299, 306 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986); Garcia v. United States, 776 F.2d 116, 118 (5th Cir.1985); Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. East Baton Rouge Parish, 735 F.2d 895 , 902 (5th Cir.1984). 3 . 511 F.2d 661, 662 (1975) (quoting First National Bank of Emlenton, Pa. v. United States, 265 F.2d 297, 299-300 (3d Cir.1959)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laura Sue Durrenberger Smith, and Martha Durrenberger McKnight Plaintiffs v. Gary Booth, District Director, I.R.S., and the United States of America
A statutory consent to suit, “since it is a relinquishment of a sovereign immunity, must be strictly interpreted.” United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 590 , 61 *97 S.Ct. 767, 771, 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941); see also Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States, 769 F.2d 299, 306 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Morris Ray Bigham and Leonel Leal, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. DiCaro, 772 F.2d 1314 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1458 , 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986); United States v. Distler, 671 F.2d 954 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S, 827, 102 S.Ct. 118 , 70 L.Ed.2d 102 (1981); United States v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 782 (8th Cir.1980); United States v. Marchand, 564 F.2d 983 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 , 98 S.Ct. 732 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DiCaro
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1007.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.