green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1575, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,360 Cheryll Gray, F/k/a Cheryll Lengyel v. Jerome Lacke, Stanley Klein, David Niemann, and Diane Kohn
See Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 855 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Day v. Wayne County Bd. of Auditors, 749 F.2d 1199, 1205 (6th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gray v. Lacke
See Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 855 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Day v. Wayne County Bd. of Auditors, 749 F.2d 1199, 1205 (6th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Republic Fabricators, Inc.
Accord, Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist, 773 F.2d 850, 854 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Williams v. Duckworth, 617 F.Supp. 597, 598-599 (D.Ind.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Byron Green v. Margaret Baron Joan Wright Sherri Shea Dr. R.T. Lara and Gary Kirchhof
See Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Finney v. Arkansas Bd. of Correction, 505 F.2d 194 , 207 (8th Cir.1974); cf. Wycoff v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 1260 , 1263 & n. 5 (8th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carapellucci v. Town of Winchester
See Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1574 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Robinson v. Moses, 644 F.Supp. 975, 980-81 (N.D.Ind.1986) (following Hamm).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary H. v. Hegstrom
See Hamm v. DeKalb, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) (“failure to provide [minimal level] of necessities violates due process— even though the conditions imposed serve some ordinarily legitimate state objective”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary v. Hegstrom
See Hamm v. DeKalb, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) ("failure to provide [minimal level] of necessities violates due process--even though the conditions imposed serve some ordinarily legitimate state objective"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986). 44 Defendants argue that the district court erred in applying these standards by (1) balancing the juveniles' liberty rights against the state's interest, thus failing to give "proper deference" to the state officials' professional judgment, and (2) improperly relying on the plaintiffs' experts in making its con…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. University of Virginia
See Alexander v. Chicago Park District, 773 F.2d 850 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Trigg v. Fort Wayne Community Schools, 766 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1985); Day v. Wayne County Bd. of Auditors, 749 F.2d 1199 (6th Cir.1984); Roybal v. City of Albequerque, 653 F.Supp. 102 (D.N.M.1986); Pollard v. City of Chicago, 643 F.Supp. 1244 (N.D.Ill.1986); Appling v. City of Brockton, 649 F.Supp. 258 (D.Mass.1986); Meyett v. Coleman, 613 F.Supp. 39 (W.D.Wis.1985); Snell v. Suffolk County, 611 F.Supp. 521 (E.D.N.Y.1985); Vermett v. Hough, 606 F.Supp. 732 (W.D.Mi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Burgos v. State of New Jersey (075736)
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb Cnty., 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir. 1985) (“[S]tate’s interest in limiting the cost of detention . . . will justify neither the complete denial of [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S. Ct. 1492 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Burgos v. State of New Jersey (075736)
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb Cnty., 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) (“[S]tate’s interest in limiting the cost of detention ... will justify neither the complete denial of [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Battle v. Anderson, 594 F.2d 786, 792 (10th Cir.1979) (“[Constitutional treatment of human beings confined to penal institutions ... is not dependent upon the willingness or the financial ability of the state to provide decent penit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bockweg v. Anderson
(2×)
See, e.g., Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 854 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986) *163 (mere change in legal theory does not create a new cause of action); Harnett v. Billman, 800 F.2d 1308, 1314 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 932 , 107 S.Ct. 1571 , 94 L.Ed.2d 763 (1987) (change in theory or measure of relief does not create a new claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Education v. Leininger
Id. at 1011 , 104 S.Ct. at 3468 (citing 20 U.S.C. §§ 1412 (4), 1414(a)(5), 1415); see also Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 856 (7th Cir.1985) (private actions based on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which provides its own remedial scheme, may not be brought under § 1983), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); cf. Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1335 (9th Cir.1990) (Rehabilitation Act of 1973 does not contain remedial structure sufficiently comprehensive to show that Congress intended to preclude handicapped employees’ § 1983 claim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
B.R. Eubanks, M.D. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Nilsen, 701 F.2d at 564 (“a judgment on the merits operates as a bar to the later suit, even though a different legal theory of recovery is advanced in the second suit”); see also Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 854 (7th Cir.) (“mere change in legal theory does not create a new cause of action” for res judicata purposes), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1985); In re Hoffman, 99 B.R. 929, 937 (N.D.Iowa 1989); In re Galerie des Monnaies of Geneva, Ltd., 55 B.R. 253, 257 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1985), aff' d, 62 B.R. 224 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eubanks v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Nilsen, 701 F.2d at 564 ("a judgment on the merits operates as a bar to the later suit, even though a different legal theory of recovery is advanced in the second suit"); see also Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 854 (7th Cir.) ("mere change in legal theory does not create a new cause of action" for res judicata purposes), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1985); In re Hoffman, 99 B.R. 929, 937 (N.D.Iowa 1989); In re Galerie des Monnaies of Geneva, Ltd., 55 B.R. 253, 257 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 62 B.R. 224 (S.D.N.Y.1986). 20 We agree with the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weaver Corp. v. Kidde, Inc.
Compare Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850, 855-56 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1095 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986) (judgment disposing of part of case final under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) but not appealable, sufficient for issue preclusion) with Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Insured Lloyd’s, 786 F.2d 1265 (5th Cir.1986) (partial summary judgment not appealable and thus not final for issue preclusion in later action); See generally Wright & Miller, § 4434 at 321-328 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monmouth County Correctional Institutional Inmates v. William Lanzaro
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) ("state's interest in limiting the cost of detention ... will justify neither the complete denial of ... [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129, 1134 (9th Cir.1981) ("costs cannot be permitted to stand in the way of eliminating conditions below Eighth Amendment standards"); Battle v. Anderson, 594 F.2d 786, 792 (10th Cir.1979) (" 'constitutional tr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monmouth County Correctional Institutional Inmates v. Lanzaro
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) (“state’s interest in limiting the cost of detention ... will justify neither the complete denial of ... [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129, 1134 (9th Cir.1981) (“costs cannot be permitted to stand in the way of eliminating conditions below Eighth Amendment standards”); Battle v. Anderson, 594 F.2d 786, 792 (10th Cir.1979) (“ ‘con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danese v. Asman
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1572-1574 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986). (“Application of the Bell v. Wolfish standard to [basic conditions such as food, living space and medical care] is exceedingly difficult and does not provide clear results.” Id. at 1573.) This has proved especially true in a case such as this where a detainee commits suicide and *716 the administrator of the deceased’s estate brings a section 1983 action alleging that the suicide was a result of improper medical care, a lack of proper training …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Acosta
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1986.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.