green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
See Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir.1961), pet. cert. dism., 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); cf. Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co., 125 F.2d 84 (7th Cir.1941); Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 194 F.2d 737 (7th Cir.1952); Hess v. Anderson, Clayton & Co., 20 F.R.D. 466 (S.D.Cal.1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Rafferman v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
See Holmes v. Mississippi Shipping Co., 301 F.2d 474 (5th Cir.1962), cert. dismissed, 371 U.S. 802 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 19 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russillo v. Scarborough
(2×)
See Sidell v. Hid, 357 S.W.2d 318 (Ky.1962), cert. dismissed, 371 U.S. 802 , 83 S.Ct. 14 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); In re Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict, 85 S.D. 443 , 185 N.W.2d 682 (1971). 13 .See, e.g., Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 363 N.E.2d 652, 659 (1977) (quoted in text after this footnote); LaBarge v. Chief Admin.
cited
Cited "see"
Olsen v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc.
See Union Carbide and Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 586 (10th Cir.1961), appeal dismissed, 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); Fed.R.Civ.P. 61.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clair Olsen v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc.
See Union Carbide and Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 586 (10th Cir.1961), appeal dismissed, 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); Fed.R.Civ.P. 61. 69 In light of what appears above, it is the conclusion of this court that the judgment of the trial court should be and it is hereby affirmed. 70 APPENDIX -------- Line Item 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 No. -------- ------- -------- -------- ------- ---- (Dollar- (Base s) Year) Total Purchases of CBS Instruments in the State of Utah other than Plaintiffs' at Wholesale Value $ 97,234 $86,806 $88,410 $ 97,922 $68,348 1 Plaintiffs' Sale…
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Kathleen Lane, A/K/A Mary K. Lane, and Ross E. Lane, Her Husband v. W. S. Wallace, M. D., Dan B. Holton, M. D., and W. W. Wersich, M. D.
See Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation v. Nisley, 10 Cir., 300 F.2d 561, 586 , petition for cert. dismissed 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.
See Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961), pet. cert. dism., 371 U.S. 801 , [ 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 ] (1963); cf. Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co., 125 F.2d 84 (7th Cir. 1941); Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 194 F.2d 737 (7th Cir. 1952); Hess v. Anderson, Clayton & Co., 20 F.R.D. 466 (S.D.Calif.1957).” The finding of the Court that questions of law or fact common to the class sought to be represented “predominate” over questions affecting only individual members and that the class action is superior to other available methods of adjudication, is the basic prer…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Master Key Antitrust Litigation
See Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 567 (10th Cir. 1961), cert. dismissed, 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. Tayloe, 67 F.R.D. 440 (E.D.Pa.1975); Sommers v. Abraham Lincoln Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 66 F.R.D. 581, 591-92 (E.D.Pa.1975); Barr v. WUI/TAS, Inc., 66 F.R.D. 109, 115 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Wainright v. Kraftco Corp., 54 F.R.D. 532, 534-35 (N.D.Ga.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.
See Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 571 (10th Cir. 1961), petition for cert. dismissed, Wade v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); United Shoe Mach.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cusumano v. Wilhelmsen
(2×)
See Holmes v. Mississippi Shipping Co., 301 F.2d 474 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 371 U.S. 802 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Michigan v. Morton Salt Company
See Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961), appeal dismissed sub nom Wade v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1963); Sun Theatre Corporation v. RKO Radio Pictures, 213 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1954); Grengs v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 232 F.2d 325 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 871 , 77 S.Ct. 96 , 1 L.Ed.2d 77 (1956); Skouras Theatres Corporation v. Radio-Keith Orpheum Corporation, 193 F.Supp. 401 (S.D.N.Y. 1961); Manny v. Warner Brothers Pictures, 116 F.Supp. 807 (S.D.Calif.1953); Electric Theatre Compan…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Philadelphia v. Morton Salt Company
See Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961), petition for cert. dismissed 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); Escott v. Barchris Const. Co., 340 F.2d 731 (2 Cir. 1965); 4 Moore Federal Practice, 147, 148 (2d Ed. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 568 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. dismissed, 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251, 264 , 66 S.Ct. 574 , 90 L.Ed. 652 (1946); see also Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 590 (10th Cir. 1962), appeal dismissed, Wade v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
See, e.g., Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961), petition for cert. dismissed 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
See, e. g., Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961), petition for cert. dismissed 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dolgow v. Anderson
See, e. g., Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisely, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961), pet. cert. dism., 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962).
Holmes
v.
Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc.
v.
Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc.
No. 268, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 23, 1962.
Samuel C. Oainsburgh and Raymond H. Kierr for petitioner.
Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.