green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“transportation, delivery or other charge”
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lifschitz v. American Express Co.
transportation, delivery or other charge
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Hill
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Kelley, 77 F.R.D. 378 (D.D.C.1977); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 297 Hawley St., Rochester, N.Y., 727 F.Supp. 90 (W.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Sessions v. Hill
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Kelley, 77 F.R.D. 378 (D.D.C.1977); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 297 Hawley St., Rochester, N.Y., 727 F.Supp. 90 (W.D.N.Y.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lopez
United States v. Garsson, 291 F. 646, 649 (S.D.N.Y.1923); see Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 , 487 n. 12 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc.
See, Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962) cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); LaRouche Campaign v. F.B.I., 106 F.R.D. 500 (D.Mass.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keese v. United States
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 491-92 (5th Cir.1962), (discussing the public interest protected by and the liberal construction of Rule 55(e)), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Initiative Petition No. 314
(4×)
See In Re Initiative Petition No. 271, State Question 408, 373 P.2d 1017 (Okl.1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 949 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 ; In re Referendum Petition No. 18, State Question No. 437, 417 P.2d 295 (Okl.1966); Bernzen v. City of Boulder, 186 Colo. 81 , 525 P.2d 416 (1974); Boucher v. Engstrom, 528 P.2d 456 (Alaska 1974); Colorado Project—Common Cause v. Anderson, 178 Colo. 1 , 495 P.2d 220 (1972); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marianna Giampaoli v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Fletcher v. Warden
See United States v. Stowe-Woodward, Inc., 306 F.2d 678 (1st Cir. 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 949 , 83 S.Ct. 503 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Prince, Screenco, Inc., Climatrol Corporation and Emery Findley, Jr.
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126-27 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael B. Bethany, No. 73-3085 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Beitel v. United States, 306 F.2d 665, 672 (5th Cir. 1962). 6 Affirmed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bethany
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Beitel v. United States, 306 F.2d 665, 672 (5th Cir. 1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Center on Corporate Responsibility, Inc. v. Shultz
See, Campbell v. Eastland, 5 Cir., 307 F.2d 478, 491-492 (1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 .
cited
Cited "see"
ALWIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Lufkin
See International Harvester Co. v. Kansas City, 308 F.2d 35 , 38 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 948 , 83 S.Ct. 503 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Kortz v. Ellingson, 181 F.Supp. 857 (D.Colo.1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Detroit Screwmatic Co. v. United States
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 488 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Unistrut Corp. v. United States, 37 F.R.D. 478 (E.D.Mich.1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perry v. McGuire
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); United States v. Maine Lobstermen’s Ass’n, 22 F.R.D. 199 (D.Me.1958); United States v. Linen Supply Institute, 18 F.R.D. 452 (S.D.N.Y. 1955); Paul Harrigan & Sons v. Enterprise Animal Oil Co., 14 F.R.D. 333 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernard v. Trujillo
See also Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 487 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963) (stating that administrative policy gives priority to the public interest in law enforcement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. John Doe
See, e.g., Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 487 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Twenty First *20 Century Corp. v. LaBianca, 801 F.Supp. 1007, 1010 (E.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corporation v. North Bridge Associates, Inc.
See, e.g., Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 485 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Barrett v. Hoffman, 521 F.Supp. 307, 315 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (collecting cases), rev’d on other grounds, 689 F.2d 324 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Integrated Generics, Inc. v. Bowen
See e.g., Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 487 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Securities and Exchange Commission v. Control Metals Corp., 57 F.R.D. 56, 58 (S.D.N.Y.1972); United States v. One 1964 Cadillac Coupe de Ville, 41 F.R.D. 352, 354 (S.D.N.Y.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marziliano v. Heckler
Compare Giampaoli v. Califano, 628 F.2d 1190, 1193 (9th Cir.1980) (rule applies only where “government has altogether failed to respond”), with Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962) (rule applies to government refusal to comply with discovery orders), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); see 10 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marziliano v. Heckler
Compare Giampaoli v. Califano, 628 F.2d 1190, 1193 (9th Cir.1980) (rule applies only where "government has altogether failed to respond"), with Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962) (rule applies to government refusal to comply with discovery orders), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); see 10 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mid-Atlantic Accessories Trade Ass'n v. Maryland
See, e. g., United States v. Ragland, 306 F.2d 732 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 949 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Israel v. United States, 63 F.2d 345 (3d Cir. 1933); Millet, Pit and Seed Co. v. United States, 436 F.Supp. 84 (E.D.Tenn.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Carson
Brown v. Brannon, 399 F.Supp. 133, 137 (M.D.N.C.1975); see also International Harvester Co. v. Kansas City, 308 F.2d 35 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 948 , 83 S.Ct. 503 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gee
See also Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).” The motion filed on behalf of the defendant asserts jurisdiction both under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and under Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Junius S. Washington v. United States
Compare Keiningham v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 295, 296-297 , 307 F.2d 632, 633-634 (1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 948 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 497 (1963); Stephens v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 249, 250-251 , 271 F.2d 832, 833-834 (1959); DeBruhl v. United States, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 126, 199 F.2d 175, 176 , cert. denied 344 U.S. 868 , 73 S.Ct. 111 , 97 L.Ed. 673 (1952) ; Mills v. United States, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 196 F.2d 600 , cert. denied 344 U.S. 826 , 73 S.Ct. 27 , 97 L.Ed. 643 (1952).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
D'Ippolito v. American Oil Company
Compare Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ross
Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew’s Inc., 283 F.2d 730, 733 (2d Cir. 1960); see also Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa and Bankers Life Company v. United States
Compare United States v. Stowe-Woodward, Inc., 306 F.2d 678, 680 (1 Cir.1962) cert. denied 371 U.S. 949 , 83 S.Ct. 503 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963), where the court stated: “ * * * considerable leeway is allowed for administrative interpretation of a statute. (citing cases.) This principle applied to a G.C.M. ruling, and is not limited to regulations, (citing eases.) If, in light of its committee report, Congress was dissatisfied with this ruling, it had over twenty years to take action.” Likewise, although Congress has reviewed the statutory provisions for the taxation of life insurance compani…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Price
v.
Christian, Secretary of State of Oklahoma
v.
Christian, Secretary of State of Oklahoma
No. 539.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1963.
Jas. A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C. Harkin for petitioners., Norman E. Reynolds, Jr. for respondents.
Cited by 57 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Certiorari denied.