Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 372 U.S. 908 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 372 U.S. 908 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
115 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Lodewijkx (nysd, 1964-06-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Lodewijkx
S.D.N.Y. · 1964 · confidence medium
S.Ct. 717, 9 L.Ed.2d 716 (1963). 7 .
cited Cited "see" Office of Navajo Labor Relations, ex rel. Jones v. Central Consolidated School District No. 22
navajo · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Navajo Tribe v. Udall, 306 F. 2d 819 (C.A.D.C. 1962), cert. den. 372 U.S. 908 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gerard Cachoian
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 308 F.2d 657, 663 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 906 , 83 S.Ct. 717 , 9 L.Ed.2d 716 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Russell L. Simpson (2×)
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 308 F.2d 657, 662-663 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 906 , 83 S.Ct. 717 , 9 L.Ed.2d 716 (1963). 5 Moreover appellant, apparently under the mistaken belief that there were no narcotics in his car, himself first suggested to the agents that they search the car.
cited Cited "see" State v. Bindhammer
N.J. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 308 F. 2d 657 (3 Cir. 1963), cert. denied 373 U. S. 906 , 83 S. Ct. 717 , 9 L.
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Holloway v. Reincke
D. Conn. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 308 F.2d 657, 663 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 906 , 83 S.Ct. 717 , 9 L.Ed.2d 716 (1963).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Association of Washington Stevedoring Companies v. Department of Revenue
Wash. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Tricon, Inc. v. King County, 60 Wn.2d 392 , 374 P.2d 174 , cert. denied, 372 U.S. 908 , 9 L.
Public Utility District No. 1, Pend Oreille County, Washington
v.
Federal Power Commission
No. 611.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1963.
372 U.S. 908
Clarence C. Dill, Lloyd W. Ek, Joseph Volpe, Jr. and Bennett Boskey for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assisi an i Attorney General Guiljoyle, Alan S. Rosenthal, Howard E. Shapiro, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Thomas M. Debevoise and Josephine H. Klein for the Federal Power Commission, and A. C. Van Soelen, Richard S. White, William A. Helsell, Robert L. McCarty and Charles F. Wheatley, Jr. for the City of Seattle, respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.