green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
“economic loss does not, in and of itself, constitute irreparable harm”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Crouse v. City of Colorado Springs
(2×)
But cf. Dodd v. City of Norwich, 827 F.2d 1 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 701 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1988) (negligent conduct never sufficient to invoke unreasonableness standards of fourth amendment).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Knutson v. AG Processing, Inc.
economic loss does not, in and of itself, constitute irreparable harm
cited
Cited "see"
Valero Interstate Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1150 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Transcanada Pipelines Limited v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1229
See Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 (D.C.Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1156 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1969 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986); Mid-Tex Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1156 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1969 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986); Mid-Tex Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louisiana Ass'n of Independent Producers & Royalty Owners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
A corollary to the “the rule that the ‘whole record’ be considered” is that interested parties must have an opportunity “to introduce adverse evidence and criticize evidence introduced by others.” Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 483 F.2d 1238, 1258 (D.C.Cir.1973) (emphasis omitted); see also Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1167-68 & n. 38 (D.C.Cir.1985) (limiting Mobil Oil on other grounds), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louisiana Association of Independent Producers and Royalty Owners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Anr Pipeline Company, Bay State Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Cng Transmission Corporation, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Long Island Lighting Company, New England Power Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transcanada Pipelines Limited, Intervenors. New England Fuel Institute, Empire State Petroleum Association, and Fuel Merchants Association of New Jersey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Anr Pipeline Company, Bay State Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Cng Transmission Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc., Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Long Island Lighting Company, New England Power Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. Anne Marie Mueser and Gasp Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Anr Pipeline Company, Bay State Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Cng Transmission Corporation, Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc., Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Long Island Lighting Company, New England Power Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transcanada Pipelines Limited, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Anr Pipeline Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Cng Transmission Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company, Louisiana Association of Independent Producers and Royalty Owners, Progas Limited, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Transcanada Pipelines Limited, Intervenors. State of Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Anr Pipeline Company, Bay State Gas Company, Burk Royalty Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Convexx Oil and Gas, Inc., Elsbury Production, Inc., Robert P. Evans, Harvey E. Yates Company, Kingdon R. Hughes, Independent Oil and Gas Association of West Virginia, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, Long Island Lighting Company, Natural Gas Anadarko Company, New England Power Company, the Southern Connecticut Gas Company, State of Oklahoma, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, J. Cleo Thompson & James Cleo Thompson, Jr., Transcanada Pipelines Limited, Union Texas Petroleum, Wolverine Gas and Oil Company, Inc., Intervenors
A corollary to the "the rule that the 'whole record' be considered" is that interested parties must have an opportunity "to introduce adverse evidence and criticize evidence introduced by others." Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 483 F.2d 1238, 1258 (D.C.Cir.1973) (emphasis omitted); see also Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1167-68 & n. 38 (D.C.Cir.1985) (limiting Mobil Oil on other grounds), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wagner & Brown v. Anr Pipeline Company
See e.g., Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1152 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986) (discussing FERC Order 380, 49 Fed.Reg. 2,778 (1984), in which FERC chose not to prohibit variable-cost components in take-or-pay clauses).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Willcox, Arizona, Southern California Gas Co., Asarco, Inc., Gas Co. Of New Mexico, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, El Paso Natural Gas Co., Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Southwest Gas Corp., Apache Powder Co., the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Intervenors. Southwest Gas Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Asarco, Inc., Gas Co. Of New Mexico, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, City of Willcox, Arizona, El Paso Natural Gas Co., Apache Powder Co., the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Southern California Gas Co., Intervenors
See, e.g., Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 1144 , 1149-52 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1969 , 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986); S. BREYER, REGULATION AND ITS REFORM 244-53 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bailey
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 85-1285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1986.
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.