green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Liebowitz
See United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 362 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S. Ct. 2281 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleveland
Accord, United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 362 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Pollina v. United States, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 (1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986) (even though warrant issued for electronic surveillance did not include a specific crime as a possible violation, authorization could be inferred when judge authorizing extension of tap was made aware of material facts constituting or clearly relating to other offenses in application for extension); United States v. Gerena, 653 F.Supp. 974, 977-79 (D.Conn. 1987)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Perlman v. Zell
See generally United States v. Bonansinga, 773 F.2d 166, 170 (7th Cir.1985) (a mailing is not in furtherance of a scheme if the scheme has already reached fruition at the time of the mailing), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Visser
See United States v. Wisniewski, 21 MJ 370 (CMA), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles E. Koen
See United States v. Bonansinga, 773 F.2d 166, 172 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 362 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Marshall
See United States v. Peco, 784 F.2d 798, 800 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yarber v. Indiana State Prison
See Grimes v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, 583 F.Supp. 642, 649 (S.D.Ind.1984), aff'd 767 F.2d 925 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2280 , 90 L.Ed.2d 722 (1986) (claim of retaliatory discharge subsequent to EEOC charge could be considered without filing of separate charge of retaliation); accord Gupta v. East Texas State University, 654 F.2d 411, 414 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fogg
(2×)
See Mil.R.Evid. 316(d)(4)(C), Manual, supra; see also United States v. Wisniewski, 21 MJ 370 (CMA 1986) (holding that sergeant peering into window of appellant’s barracks room did not violate legitimate expectation of privacy because sergeant made plain-view observation from common walkway where any passerby could have made the same observation), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); United States v. Bonfiglio, 713 F.2d 932 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Whitten, 706 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1593 , 80 L.Ed.2d 125 (1984…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Wilson Murphy v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
See also Turner v. Parsons, 620 F.Supp. 138 (E.D.Pa.1985) (holding that the endorsing requirement does not violate the Establishment Clause), aff'd, 787 F.2d 584 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2280 , 90 L.Ed.2d 722 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin Davis
United States v. Scaife, 749 F.2d 338, 348 (6th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 360-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986) (finding no scienter requirement that defendants know they were obstructing a federal proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Urrego De Soto, Gustavo Chaverra Cardona, and Ruth Urrego Chaverra
The admission of expert testimony, like all evidentiary determinations, constitutes a ground for reversal by a court of appeals “only where the district court commits a clear abuse of discretion.” United States v. Marshall, 856 F.2d 896, 901 (7th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Peco, 784 F.2d 798, 800 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 *360 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schreiber, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ross
v.
Chase Federal Savings & Loan Assn.
v.
Chase Federal Savings & Loan Assn.
No. 85-1810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1986.
Published
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.