green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commercial Union Insurance v. Sepco Corp.
Notwithstanding the law of the case doctrine, a district court on remand “is free to address, as a matter of first impression, those issues not disposed of on appeal.” Id. at 1119 (citations omitted); see also Litman v. Massachusetts Mut.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee
Although a “trial court, upon receiving the mandate of an appellate court, ... must enter an order in strict compliance with the mandate[,] ... the trial court is free to address, as a matter of first impression, those issues not disposed of on appeal.” Id. at 1119.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee
Although a "trial court, upon receiving the mandate of an appellate court, ... must enter an order in strict compliance with the mandate[,] ... the trial court is free to address, as a matter of first impression, those issues not disposed of on appeal." Id. at 1119. 16 In the district court's original order, the court dismissed several ERISA claims, refused to dismiss some ERISA claims, and certified two ERISA issues for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ad-Vantage Telephone Directory Consultants, Inc., Cross v. Gte Directories Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Id. at 1120 (citations omitted) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hester v. International Union of Operating Engineers
Notwithstanding the law of the case doctrine, a district court on remand "is free to address, as a matter of first impression, those issues not disposed of on appeal.” Id. at 1119 (citations omitted); see also Litman v. Massachusetts Mut.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hester v. International Union Of Operating Engineers
Notwithstanding the law of the case doctrine, a district court on remand "is free to address, as a matter of first impression, those issues not disposed of on appeal." Id. at 1119 (citations omitted); see also Litman v. Massachusetts Mut.
cited
Cited "see"
Wyatt Ex Rel. Rawlins v. Sawyer
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. Alabama State Board of Education
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1139 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986); Pettway, 576 F.2d at 1169 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Paquin v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir.1985) (stating that an appellate decision on an issue must be followed in all subsequent trial court proceedings "unless the presentation of new evidence ... dictates *19 a different result"), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir.1985) (stating that an appellate decision on an issue must be followed in all subsequent trial court proceedings “unless the presentation of new evidence ... dictates a different result”), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department Of Natural Resources
See id. (citing Cherokee Nation v. Oklahoma, 461 F.2d 674, 677 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1039 , 93 S.Ct. 521 , 34 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972), and Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112 , 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986)). 27 Thus, the district court, once it had this court's mandate and the record, had a reversed dismissal--and a live complaint--on its hands.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
See id. (citing Cherokee Nation v. Oklahoma, 461 F.2d 674, 677 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1039 , 93 S.Ct. 521 , 34 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972), and Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin J. Cote Patricia S. Caldwell
Furthermore, “[t]he opinion delivered by [the] court at the time of rendering its decree may be consulted to ascertain what was intended by its mandate.” Sanford, 160 U.S. at 256 , 16 S.Ct. at 293 ; accord Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence W. Berman, Marilyn Berman, and Forex Corporation
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986). 12 CONCLUSION In sum, we conclude that the district court was within its discretion in refusing to entertain the Bermans’ statute of limitations argument, that the court did not err in finding actual fraud in the conveyances to Forex, that the government was not collaterally estopped from asserting that the conveyances were fraudulent, and that the court correctly rejected the Bermans’ contention that notice and demand were necessary for reduction of the defici…
cited
Cited "see"
Behrens v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.
See Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1139-42 (11th Cir.1985) cert. denied sub nom, Hoffman v. Sylva, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie Jasper Darden v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent
See Spinkellink v. Wainwright, 578 F.2d 582 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 976 , 99 S.Ct. 1548 , 59 L.Ed.2d 796 (1979). 21 Petitioner included this claim in his third petition for federal habeas relief filed in October, 1986, 22 asserting that there are viable studies now available to rely upon and the intervening grants of certiorari in McClesky v. Kemp, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3331 , 92 L.Ed.2d 737 (1986) and Hitchcock v. Wainwright, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2888 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986) warrant merits resolution of his claim.
cited
Cited "see"
Exxon Corp. v. United States
Accord e.g., Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir.1985), cert. den., — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 ; Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 108 (2d Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Wainwright
See Hitchcock v. Wainwright, 770 F.2d 1514, 1517 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc) (evidentiary hearings generally preferable in habeas cases raising Lockett claims), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 2888 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Wainwright
See Hitchcock v. Wainwright, 770 F.2d 1514, 1517 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc) (evidentiary hearings generally preferable in habeas cases raising Lockett claims), cert, granted, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2888 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berry v. Phelps
See, McCleskey v. Kemp, 753 F.2d 877 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3331 , 92 L.Ed.2d 737 (1986) and Hitchcock v. Wainwright, 745 F.2d 1332 (11th Cir.1985), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2888 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Deadwyler v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
See also Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1144 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
See, e.g., Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1142-43 (11th Cir.1985) (injunction vacated in prior appeal), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986); Coyne-Delaney Co. v. Capital Dev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Division No. 1, Detroit, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See, e.g., Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1142-43 (11th Cir.1985) (injunction vacated in prior appeal), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1169 , 106 S.Ct. 2889 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986); Coyne-Delaney Co. v. Capital Dev.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sterling R. Rault, Sr. v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
See also Hitchcock v. Wainwright, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2888 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McMurtrey
See also Hitchcock v. Wainwright, 770 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir.1985), cert. granted in part, —U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2888 , 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cruz
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 85-5939.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1986.
Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis and certiorari granted.