green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.3 score
“ujnless applied with circumspection, the artful pleading doctrine may raise difficult issues of federal-state relations. an expansive application of the doctrine could effectively abrogate the rule that a plaintiff is master of his or her complaint”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Redwood Theatres, Incorporated v. Festival Enterprises, Inc.
nless applied with circumspection, the artful pleading doctrine may raise difficult issues of federal-state relations. an expansive application of the doctrine could effectively abrogate the rule that a plaintiff is master of his or her complaint
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Redwood Theatres, Inc. v. Festival Enterprises, Inc.
ujnless applied with circumspection, the artful pleading doctrine may raise difficult issues of federal-state relations. an expansive application of the doctrine could effectively abrogate the rule that a plaintiff is master of his or her complaint
discussed
Cited "see"
Connolly v. Union Pacific R. Co.
See United Jersey Banks v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360, 368 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom First Fidelity Bancorp. v. Parell, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986); see, e.g., Hillard v. Dobelman, 774 F.2d 886, 887 (8th Cir.1985) (petition framed as a state law tort action was in reality a claim for breach of collective bargaining agreement under the LMRA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shapiro v. Middlesex County Municipal Joint Insurance Fund
Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846-47 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983); accord United Jersey Banks v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360, 365 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., First Fidelity Bancorporation v. Parell, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
No. 92-2545
See LaSalle Nat'l Bank v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377, 385 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage
See LaSalle Nat’l Bank v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377, 385 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goehl v. Mellon Bank (DE)
Additionally, under the well-pleaded complaint rule, a case is not removable to federal court based on a federal defense, “ ‘including the defense of pre-emption, even if the defense is anticipated in the complaint, and even if both parties concede that the federal defense is the only question truly at issue.’ ” Id. (quoting Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 393 , 107 S.Ct. at 2430 ); see United Jersey Banks v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360, 367 (3d Cir.) (plaintiffs claims did not “arise under” federal law where state claims could be defeated because of preemptive effect of federal banking laws), c…
discussed
Cited "see"
TM Marketing, Inc. v. Art & Antiques Associates, L.P.
First, a federal right or immunity creates a federal question only where it is “an element, and an essential one, of the plaintiffs cause of action.” Gully v. First Nat’l Bk., 299 U.S. 109, 112 , 57 S.Ct. 96, 97 , *999 81 L.Ed. 70 (1936); accord United Jersey Bks. v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360 , 365 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., First Fidelity Ban-corporation v. Parell, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986); New Jersey State AFL-CIO v. New Jersey, 747 F.2d 891, 892 (3d.
cited
Cited "see"
Los v. Wardell
See LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377, 379 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
King Provision Corp. v. Burger King Corp.
See United Jersey Banks v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cynthia Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
(2×)
See LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377, 379 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
No. 87-2497
See LaSalle Nat'l Bank v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage
See LaSalle Nat’l Bank v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cynthia Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
(2×)
See LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377, 379 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986). 3 According to the complaint, approximately 60,000 state employees work in more than fifty "departments, boards and commissions under the jurisdiction" of Governor Thompson.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gemcraft Homes, Inc. v. Sumurdy
See Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Sarkisian, 794 F.2d 754, 760-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 885 , 107 S.Ct. 277 , 93 L.Ed.2d 253 (1986), United Jersey Banks v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360, 368 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vartan v. Harristown Development Corp.
See LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage, 777 F.2d 377 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986); Reasor v. City of Norfolk, 606 F.Supp. 788 (E.D.Va.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colletti
v.
County of Prince William, Virginia
v.
County of Prince William, Virginia
No. 85-1684.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
Cir. Ct. Prince William County, Va. Certiorari denied.