United States v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 476 U.S. 1181 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 476 U.S. 1181 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Evans v. McKay (ca9, 1989-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Evans v. McKay
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Big Spring v. United States BIA, 767 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1181 , 106 S.Ct. 2914 , 91 L.Ed.2d 543 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Evans v. Mckay
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Big Spring v. United States BIA, 767 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1181 , 106 S.Ct. 2914 , 91 L.Ed.2d 543 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Uop, a General Partnership v. United States of America Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United States, 895 F.2d 588, 592 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 824 , 111 S.Ct. 75 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990) (“The plaintiffs failure to sue within the period of limitations is not simply a waivable defense; it deprives the court of jurisdiction to entertain the action.”); see also Big Spring v. United States, 767 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1985) (“Section 2401(a), if it applies, is jurisdictional.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1181 , 106 S.Ct. 2914 , 91 L.Ed.2d 543 (1986); Loring v. United States, 610 F.2d 649, 650 (9th Cir.1979) (Section 2401(a) is juri…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Albert Pinkham, Sr. Cyrus Wilkinson Connie Allen Moore Francis Allen v. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District, and United States of America
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Supreme Court has reasoned that section 345 grants district courts subject-matter jurisdiction over two types of cases: “suits seeking the issuance of an allotment ... and suits involving ‘the interest and rights of the Indian in his allotment or patent after he has acquired it.’ ” United States v. Mottaz, 476 U.S. 834, 845 , 106 S.Ct. 2224, 2231 , 90 L.Ed.2d 841 (1986) (quoting Scholder v. United States, 428 F.2d 1123, 1129 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 942 , 91 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed.2d 246 (1970)); see also Christensen v. United States, 755 F.2d 705, 707 (9th Cir.1985), cert. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
General Dynamics Corp.
No. 85-1385.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1986.
476 U.S. 1181
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted.