green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Snyder
(2×)
See Martin v. Foltz, 773 F.2d 711, 717 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 3336 , 92 L.Ed.2d 741 (1986) (stating that “although an emotional appeal such as the one made by the' prosecutor in this case may be improper, it was isolated in the context of the entire trial” and that a “prosecutor is permitted a certain degree of latitude in summation”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dhaity v. Warden
(2×)
See also Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1085 (8th Cir.1985) (federal habeas relief “is unavailable for alleged error in the interpretation or application of state law”), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 3336 , 92 L.Ed.2d 741 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boultinghouse v. Hall
(2×)
See Miller v. Vasquez, 868 F.2d 1116, 1118-19 (9th Cir.1989) (holding that question of whether particular prior conviction qualifies for sentence enhancement under California law is not cognizable on federal habeas corpus); see also Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 3336 , 92 L.Ed.2d 741 (1986) (federal habeas relief “unavailable for alleged error in the interpretation or application of state law”); Sturm v. California Adult Authority, 395 F.2d 446, 448 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 466 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerlaugh v. Lewis
(2×)
Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-69 , 112 S.Ct. 475, 480 , 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991); see also Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 3336 , 92 L.Ed.2d 741 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Vasquez
(2×)
See also Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021, 106 S.Ct. 3336 , 92 L.Ed.2d 741 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gannon v. Lewis
See also, Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 3336 (1986); Quiroz v. Wawrzaszek, 749 F.2d 1375 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 2119 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Childress
(2×)
Although the evidence at trial did not compare the quantity of cocaine linked to the criminal enterprise headed by Rayful Edmond, III with that of similar criminal enterprises in the District of Columbia, the prosecutor’s reference to this quantity was *1133 “fairly suggested by the evidence [and] by matters of common knowledge outside the evidence.” United States v. Johns, 734 F.2d 657, 663 (11th Cir.1984); see also Martin v. Foltz, 773 F.2d 711, 717 (6th Cir.1985) (explaining that a prosecutor can draw reasonable inferences from the evidence in argument), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John P. McDermott Jr. v. E.P. Perini
An omission, or an incomplete instruction, is less likely to be prejudicial than a misstatement of the law. 25 Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 154-55 (1977) (citations and footnote omitted); see also Martin v. Foltz, 773 F.2d 711, 718 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 3336 (1986). "[I]f the state court finds the instructions correct (as it did here), then only where the instructions infect the fairness of the entire trial will due process be violated." Owens v. Foltz, 797 F.2d 294, 296 (6th Cir.1986). 26 In the present case, the question thus becomes whether the failure to instruct on …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin
v.
Foltz, Warden
v.
Foltz, Warden
No. 85-5913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 7, 1986.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.