green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2004 ·
…when an agency decision has two distinct bases, one of which provides for exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeals, the entire decision is reviewable exclusively in the appellate court.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Communities Against Runway Expansion, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
when an agency decision has two distinct bases, one of which provides for exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeals, the entire decision is reviewable exclusively in the appellate court.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commty Agnst Runway v. FAA
when an agency decision has two distinct bases, one of which provides for exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeals, the entire decision is reviewable exclusively in the appellate court.
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Stratford v. Federal Aviation Administration
See Suburban O’Hare Comm’n v. Dole, 787 F.2d 186 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 169 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Twn Stratford CT v. FAA
See Suburban O'Hare Comm'n v. Dole, 787 F.2d 186 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 169 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Li
See United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270, 1283-84 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 168 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Tracy and Francisco Luis Aguilar
Accord United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270, 1285 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 168 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986); United States v. Vinson, 606 F.2d 149, 153 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1020 , 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morton Scherl, Also Known as Robert Caldwell
See United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270, 1304 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 168 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Webb
See United States v. Cantu, 786 F.2d 712 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (no conflict where jointly represented codefendants charged with conspiracy to file false tax returns pursued joint defense claiming that neither party filed fraudulent returns), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 169 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986); Mers, 701 F.2d at 1329 (no conflict where codefendants pressed same defense and corroborated each other); Government of Canal Zone v. Hodges, 589 F.2d 207 (5th Cir.) (joint alibi defense), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948 , 99 S.Ct. 2173 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1979); Wright v. State, 442 So.2d 301…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Peters, *753 791 F.2d 1270 , 1288 n. 22 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 168 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986); United States v. Jefferson, 714 F.2d 689, 703-06 (7th Cir.1983); 43 see also United States v. Possick, 849 F.2d 332, 341 (8th Cir.1988); United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 750 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); cf. Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773, 794 , 105 S.Ct. 2407, 2419 , 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985); Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137, 150 , 97 S.Ct. 2207, 2216 , 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Lee Lance, Willie Love, and Rebecca Lance
See United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270, 1284-86 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Odoner v. United States, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 168 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard R. Willard v. Linley Pearson, Attorney General, Indiana, and Raymond J. Lippman, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana
To show his trial was fundamentally unfair, Willard must demonstrate, at a minimum, “prejudice sufficient to warrant relief under Fed.R.Cr.P. 14 or its state counterpart....” Alvarez v. Wainwright, 607 F.2d 683, 685 (5th Cir.1979); see United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270, 1287 (7th Cir.) (in a federal criminal trial, the essential issue in determining whether a trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion to sever crimes is whether the trial court’s action caused de *1150 fendant to suffer substantial actual prejudice), ce rt. denied sub nom., Odoner v. United States, — U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conoco, Inc. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., in No. 91-3589 v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of Transportation Warren G. Leback, Maritime Administrator and the United States of America. Conoco, Inc. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., in No. 91-3920 v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of Transportation Nicholas F. Brady William A. Kime, Commandant of the Coast Guard Warren G. Leback, Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation Carol B. Hallett, Commissioner of Customs, U.S. Customs Service
"In the absence of specific evidence of contrary congressional intent ... we have held that review of orders resolving issues preliminary or ancillary to the core issue in a proceeding should be reviewed in the same forum as the final order resolving the core issue." Florida Power, 470 U.S. at 743 , 105 S.Ct. at 1606 ; see also Suburban O'Hare Comm'n v. Dole, 787 F.2d 186, 192 (7th Cir.) ("When an agency decision has two distinct bases, one of which provides for exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeals, the entire decision is reviewable exclusively in the appellate court."), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conoco, Inc. v. Skinner
"In the absence of specific evidence of contrary congressional intent ... we have held that review of orders resolving issues preliminary or ancillary to the core issue in a proceeding should be reviewed in the same forum as the final order resolving the core issue." Florida Power, 470 U.S. at 743 , 105 S.Ct. at 1606 ; see also Suburban O’Hare Comm’n v. Dole, 787 F.2d 186, 192 (7th Cir.) ("When an agency decision has two distinct bases, one of which provides for exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeals, the entire decision is reviewable exclusively in the appellate court.”), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valley Citizens for a Safe Environment v. Edward C. Aldridge, Etc.
See also Suburban O’Hare Commission v. Dole, 787 F.2d 186, 197 (7th Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 169 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986); Webb v. Gorsuch, 699 F.2d 157, 160 (4th Cir.1983) (“When there is conflicting expert opinion, it is for the administrative agency and not the courts to resolve the conflict”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers v. Skinner
See also Suburban O'Hare Commission v. Dole, 787 F.2d 186, 192 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 169 , 93 L.Ed.2d 106 (1986); Public Utility Commissioner v. Bonneville Power Admin., 767 F.2d 622 , 626-27 (9th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
Colorado
v.
Colorado
No. 85-7239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.