green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frostman
See United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 116 (4th Cir. 1991) (“ ‘The manner of ensuring that the defendant is properly informed is committed to the good judgment of the district court, to its calculation of the relative difficulty of comprehension of the charges and of the defendant’s sophistication and intelligence.’ ” (quoting United States v. Reckmeyer, 786 F.2d 1216, 1221 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Robinson
See Allen v. Allen, 484 So.2d 269 (La.App.3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, 488 So.2d 199 (La.1986), U.S. cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986) (“Rights to retirement benefits accrue continuously throughout the husband’s period of service, and the wife’s entitlement to those benefits should be determined under the law of the States in which the parties were domiciled for the respective periods during which |Rretirement benefits accrued”); Little v. Little, 513 So.2d 464, 471 (La.App.2nd Cir.1987) (“...a portion of the military retirement pay, which a former hus…
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Astra U.S.A., Inc.
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1044-45 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Wagner v. Nutrasweet Co.
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1043-44 (6th Cir.) (en banc) cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Whittle v. United States
See Nordgren v. Hafter, 789 F.2d 334, 339 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986) (Mississippi permitted to distinguish between in-state and out-of-state graduates of non-ABA accredited law schools for bar administration purposes). 13 Whittle may very well be an extremely capable attorney, one whose services would be welcome in both the IRS and the Army.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whittle v. United States
See Nordgren v. Hafter, 789 F.2d 334, 339 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986) (Mississippi permitted to distinguish between in-state and out-of-state graduates of non-ABA accredited law schools for bar administration purposes).
discussed
Cited "see"
Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. Currency
See United States v. Campos, 859 F.2d 1233, 1239 (6th Cir.1988) (“Despite this broad construction of § 881(a)(6) unsecured creditors generally have been unsuccessful in pursuing claims against property subject to civil forfeiture. ...”) (quoting United States v. Reckmeyer, 836 F.2d 200 , 206 n. 3 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cornell Augustus McKenzie United States of America v. Marlon Bramwell, A/K/A May Day, United States of America v. Kakuga Waters, A/K/A Cougar, United States of America v. Kenneth Ford, A/K/A K-9
See United States v. Hawkins, 788 F.2d 200, 203 (4th Cir.) (finding that defendant lacked standing to challenge admissibility of evidence seized from another's residence), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 (1986) 6 We have previously suggested that if the Fourth Amendment issue is not novel, "a determination that probable cause is lacking is not always necessary before addressing the good faith exception under Leon." United States v. Edwards, 798 F.2d 686 , 690 n.2 (4th Cir. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Avery Herndon
See United States v. Reckmeyer, 786 F.2d 1216, 1222 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986); *1417 United, States v. Roberts, 749 F.2d 404, 409-10 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1058 , 105 S.Ct. 1770 , 84 L.Ed.2d 830 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles R. Wilcox
See United States v. Reckmeyer, 786 F.2d 1216, 1224 (4th Cir.) (agreement construed as applying only to further prosecutions), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Menefee v. State
See Lockett v. State , 489 So.2d 653 , 659 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, *Page 645 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis S. Leavitt v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1043 (6th Cir.) (ADEA case), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perry v. State
See Lockett v. State , 489 So.2d 653 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), cert. denied, Lockett v. Alabama , 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986) (possession sufficiently shown where appellant's wallet was found in pants which were located in bedroom in which the narcotics were discovered).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortloff Corp. v. Gulsby Engineering, Inc.
See generally Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1557 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986). 29.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Libretti v. United States
Compare United States v. Reckmeyer, 786 F. 2d 1216, 1222 (CA4) (Rule 11(f) applies to forfeiture provisions in plea agreements), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 850 (1986), and United States v. Roberts, 749 F. 2d 404, 409 (CA7 1984) (same), cert. denied, 470 U. S. 1058 (1985), with United States v. Boatner, 966 F. 2d 1575, 1581 (CA11 1992) (Rule 11(f) does not apply to stipulated forfeiture provisions in plea agreements), United States v. Bachynsky, 949 F. 2d 722, 730-731 (CA5 1991) (Rule 11(f) does not apply to forfeiture provisions, but a forfeiture order will be upheld only if the record provides a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sri International, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.
See also Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1560 , 229 USPQ 561, 564 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 (1986) (when a party attacking validity relies only on prior art that was before the PTO examiner during prosecution, that party has added burden of overcoming the deference due a qualified governmental agency). 17 ATL argues that the affidavit and testimony of its expert, Dr. Fox, creates an issue of fact respecting the issue of obviousness of the claims in view of Weighart.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schumacher v. Nix
See, e.g., Nordgren v. Hafter, 789 F.2d 334 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986); Lupert v. California State Bar, 761 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir.), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 474 U.S. 916 , 106 S.Ct. 241 , 88 L.Ed.2d 251 (1985); Salibra v. Supreme Court of Ohio, 730 F.2d 1059 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 295 , 83 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Lowrie v. Goldenkersh, 716 F.2d 401 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schumacher v. Nix
See, e.g., Nordgren v. Hafter, 789 F.2d 334 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986); Lupert v. California State Bar, 761 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir.), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 474 U.S. 916 , 106 S.Ct. 241 , 88 L.Ed.2d 251 (1985); Salibra v. Supreme Court of Ohio, 730 F.2d 1059 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 295 , 83 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Lowrie v. Goldenhersh, 716 F.2d 401 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barkley
See Phungphiphadhana, 640 F.Supp. at 88 ; see also United States v. Hawkins, 788 F.2d 200, 204 (4th Cir.1986) (holding that special parole term not authorized for violation of § 846), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 176 , 93 L.Ed.2d 112 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James J. Nicholson v. Cpc International Inc., a Corporation, and James R. Eiszner
(2×)
Compare Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1045 (6th Cir.) (substantive waivers judged under standard contract principles), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Intra Corporation and Eagle Technologies, Inc. v. Hamar Laser Instruments, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant
See, e.g., Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1558 , 229 USPQ 561, 562 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 (1986); Fromson v. Advance Offset Press, Inc., 755 F.2d 1549, 1555 , 225 USPQ 26, 30 (Fed.Cir.1985); Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1513 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 (1984). 7 Intra's argument is most notably deficient in its failure to mention the specific claim language.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Coventry v. United States Steel Corporation
See, e.g., Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (there is not an absolute bar to release of claims under the ADEA despite similarities between that act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, for which there is an absolute bar against the waiver of claims), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986); Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coventry v. United States Steel Corp.
See, e.g., Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (there is not an absolute bar to release of claims under the ADEA despite similarities between that act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, for which there is an absolute bar against the waiver of claims), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986); Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baccus v. Karger
See, e.g., Nordgren v. Hafter, 789 F.2d 334, 339-49 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 177 , 93 L.Ed.2d 113 (1986) (upholding Mississippi rule denying bar admission to graduates of out-of-State, non-ABA-accredited law schools, even though similar restriction did not apply to graduates of in-State, non-ABA-accredited schools); Jones v. Board of Comm’rs, 737 F.2d 996, 1001-02 , reh'g denied, 745 F.2d 72 (11th Cir.1984) (upholding Alabama rule limiting to five the number of times an individual may sit for the bar examination); Lowrie v. Goldenhersh, 716 F.2d 401, 4…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald
v.
Egger, Commissioner of the Department of Internal Revenue
v.
Egger, Commissioner of the Department of Internal Revenue
No. 86-65.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.