green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
“we construe this requirement strictly. 'even if the efforts he did make were "substantial," "diligent" or "in good faith," ... the fact that he did not make "all reasonable efforts" establishes that did not sufficiently rebut the ... prima facie showing of contempt.”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Greenberg
we construe this requirement strictly. 'even if the efforts he did make were "substantial," "diligent" or "in good faith," ... the fact that he did not make "all reasonable efforts" establishes that did not sufficiently rebut the ... prima facie showing of contempt.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnette
See Combs v. Ryan’s Coal Co., 785 F.2d 970 , 980 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub *1539 nom, Simmons v. Combs, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 187 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ten Cartons, Ener-B Nasal Gel
See id., 361 U.S. at 291-92 , 80 S.Ct. at 334-35 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bellomo v. United Arab Shipping Co.(SAG)
See Ercole v. K/S Difko XLIII Kodif XLIII A.p.S., 793 F.Supp. 61, 64 (E.D.N.Y.1992) (“The dispute over when and where, if at all, a dangerous condition was created is material to a 33 U.S.C. § 905 (b) action”) (citing Kakavas v. Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A., 789 F.2d 112, 118-119 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard E. Davis Priscilla Davis, His Wife v. Portline Transportes Maritime Internacional
(2×)
See Kakavas v. Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A., 789 F.2d 112, 117 (2d Cir.) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santo Scala v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.
See Kakavas v. Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A., 789 F.2d 112, 119-20 (2d Cir.) (reversing where jury instruction departed from standards set forth in Scindia), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyatt, by and Through Rawlins v. King
See Combs v. Ryan’s Coal Co., Inc., 785 F.2d 970, 979 (11th Cir.) (defendants’ compliance for three months rebuts claim of vagueness), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 187 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ercole v. K/S Difko XLIII Kodif XLIII A.p.S.
See Kakavas v. Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A., 789 F.2d 112, 118-19 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter Alessandri v. April Industries, Inc.
See Combs v. Ryan’s Coal Co., 785 F.2d 970 , 980-81, 984 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 187 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986) (where party failed to make “good faith effort to fulfill the obligations of the original consent decree” by making payments in installments, it was proper for district court to “enter[ ] a final judgment ordering payment in full of the amount due under the ... decree”). *3 April argues that Alessandri’s failure to begin his $7,000-related installment payments somehow freed it from making its $120,000-related payment without loss of its right to s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jupitz v. National Shipping Co. of Saudi Arabia
See Kakavas v. Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A., 789 F.2d 112, 118 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986) (shipowner’s duty of care qualified by “reasonable reliance on the expertise of the stevedore” where the hazard is known to stevedore).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S.E.C. v. AMX, Intern., Inc.
Comm'n v. Blatt, 583 F.2d 1325, 1335 (5th Cir.1978); see also Commodities Futures Trading Comm'n v. British American Commodity Options Corp., 788 F.2d 92, 94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amx, International, Inc., William B. Clark
Comm'n v. Blatt, 583 F.2d 1325, 1335 (5th Cir.1978); see also Commodities Futures Trading Comm'n v. British American Commodity Options Corp., 788 F.2d 92, 94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bilzerian
First City Fin., 890 F.2d at 1231 ; see also Commodities Futures Trading Comm’n v. British American Commodity Options Corp., 788 F.2d 92, 93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 186 , 93 L.Ed.2d 120 (1986); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 1301, 1308 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1005 , 92 S.Ct. 562 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971) and reh’g denied, 404 U.S. 1064 , 92 S.Ct. 733 , 30 L.Ed.2d 753 (1972); SEC v. Wills, 472 F.Supp. 1250, 1276 (D.D.C.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kakavas
v.
Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S. A.
v.
Flota Oceanica Brasileira, S. A.
No. 86-176.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.