green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.2 score
“late amendments to assert new theories are not reviewed favorably when the facts and the theory have been known to the party seeking amendment since the inception of the cause of action”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Volkman v. United Transportation Union
But see Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393 , 1396, n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986) (duty of fair representation claims relating to negotiation of collective bargaining agreements or work rules are not subject to exhaustion requirement and statute of limitations is not tolled by internal appeals). 56 The exhaustion requirement contained in the UTU constitution is significant.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Volkman v. United Transportation Union
But see Acri v. International Ass’n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393, 1396, n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986) (duty of fair representation claims relating to negotiation of collective bargaining agreements or work rules are not subject to exhaustion requirement and statute of limitations is not tolled by internal appeals).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Keenan v. Allan
late amendments to assert new theories are not reviewed favorably when the facts and the theory have been known to the party seeking amendment since the inception of the cause of action
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joseph E. O'Neill v. Air Line Pilots Association, International
a duty of fair representation cause of action can be maintained when union representatives make misrepresentations to the union membership during the ratification process
discussed
Cited "see"
Hotchkins v. Fleet Delivery Service
See Kaplan, 49 F.3d at 1370 (“[L]ate amendments to assert new theories are not reviewed favorably when the facts and the theory have been known to the party seeking amendment since the inception of the cause of action.”) (quoting Acri v. International Ass’n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393 , 1398 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernest Considine v. Newspaper Agency Corporation
See Ackley v. Western Conference of Teamsters, 958 F.2d 1463, 1472 (9th Cir.1992) ("Union members may maintain an action for a breach of the duty of fair representation based on misrepresentations" only if they "demonstrate a 'causal relationship between the alleged misrepresentations and their injury.' ") (quoting Acri v. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393 , 1397 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Considine v. Newspaper Agency Corp.
See Ackley v. Western Conference of Teamsters, 958 F.2d 1463, 1472 (9th Cir.1992) (“Union members may maintain an action for a breach of the duty of fair representation based on misrepresentations” only if they “demonstrate a ‘causal relationship between the alleged misrepresentations and their injury.’ ”) (quoting Acri v. Int'l Ass’n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393, 1397 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Ackley and Steven Cole v. Western Conference of Teamsters
See Acri v. International Ass’n of Machinists, 595 F.Supp. 326, 333-34 (N.D.Cal.1983) (denying motion to amend pleadings to add a cause of action under section 101(a)(1) of the LMRDA), aff’d, 781 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Calhoun v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.
See Acri v. Int’l Ass’n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393, 1398 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shiny Rock Mining Corp. v. United States
See Acri v. International Ass’n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393, 1396 (9th Cir.) (“Under federal law a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff is aware of the wrong and can successfully bring a cause of action.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shiny Rock Mining Corporation v. United States
See Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393 , 1396 (9th Cir.) ("Under federal law a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff is aware of the wrong and can successfully bring a cause of action."), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986). 12 Actual knowledge of government action, however, is not required for a statutory period to commence.
cited
Cited "see"
Degan v. Ford Motor Company
See Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 781 F.2d 1393 , 1397 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Degan v. Ford Motor Co.
See Acri v. International Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 781 F.2d 1393, 1397 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. Steeves
See, e.g., Alinovi v. Worcester School Committee, 777 F.2d 776, 787 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 816 , 107 S.Ct. 72 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986) (letters of reprimand issued to teacher by school administration did not implicate an issue of “public concern” under Connick , despite tangential connection to an incident implicating the teacher’s Fourth Amendment rights; “when [the teacher] posted the letters ... she was not concerned with any possible violation of her Fourth Amendment rights, but rather, with [a] purely personal issue concerning the lack of action on the part of the ad…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reginald Childs v. Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees, and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
See also Acri v. International Association of Machinists, 781 F.2d 1393 , 1396 n. 1 (9th Cir.1986) (the traditional approach to accrual in DFR cases is that cause of action for DFR does not accrue until the arbitrator renders his decision), cert. denied, — U.S. <-, 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986); Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 449 (8th Cir.1975) (date of accrual of DFR action against union is date of grievance rejection); Clark v. Local 95, International Union of Operating Engineers, 588 F.Supp. 1371 (W.D.Pa.1984) (same); see also Larry…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 544, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,221, 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,656 Stanley M. Janikowski v. Bendix Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
See also Acri v. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 781 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986); Ansam Associates v. Cola Petroleum, Ltd., 760 F.2d 442 (2d Cir.1985); Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp., 722 F.2d 922 (1st Cir.1983); Roberts v. Arizona Board of Regents, 661 F.2d 796 (9th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janikowski v. Bendix Corp.
See also Acri v. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 781 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986); Ansam Associates v. Cola Petroleum, Ltd., 760 F.2d 442 (2d Cir.1985); Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp., 722 F.2d 922 (1st Cir.1983); Roberts v. Arizona Board of Regents, 661 F.2d 796 (9th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
See also Acri v. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers District Lodge 115, 781 F.2d 1393, 1396 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986); McNaughton v. Dillingham Corp., 722 F.2d 1459, 1460-62 (9th Cir.1984) (McNaughton II) (denying petition for rehearing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John G. Kelley v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers
See also Acri v. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers District Lodge 115, 781 F.2d 1393, 1396 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 73 , 93 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986); McNaughton v. Dillingham Corp., 722 F.2d 1459, 1460-62 (9th Cir.1984) (McNaughton II) (denying petition for rehearing). 6 We agree with the district court that plaintiffs were not prejudiced in this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cestaro
v.
Corcoran, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York
v.
Corcoran, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York
No. 85-1819.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · E.D. Washington (1)
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.