green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gibbons v. State
See Hoffart v. State, 686 S.W.2d 259, 264 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1985, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 824 , 107 S.Ct. 95 , 93 L.Ed.2d 46 (1986); see also Salinas v. State, 514 S.W.2d 754, 755 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Clay v. State, 710 S.W.2d 119, 120 (Tex.App. — Waco 1986, no pet.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allison v. City of Birmingham
See also Hoffart v. State , 686 S.W.2d 259 (Tex.App. 1985), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 824 , 107 S.Ct. 95 , 93 L.Ed.2d 46 (1986) (trial court did not err by failing to give instruction on mistake of fact in case involving criminal trespass of abortion clinic).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriquez v. United States
In support of this proposition, the government relies on numerous cases holding that “the primary responsibility for avoiding collision ... in VFR conditions is with the pilot.” In re N-500L Cases, 691 F.2d at 28 ; see also, e.g., Murff v. United States, 785 F.2d 552, 554 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 95 , 93 L.Ed.2d 46 (1986); Kack v. United States, 570 F.2d 754, 756 (8th Cir.1978); Tilley v. United States, 375 F.2d at 682-83 ; United States v. Miller, 303 F.2d 703, 710 (9th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 507 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Noelia Rodriquez, Administratrix of the Estate of Carlos A. Rodriquez and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of Carlos A. Rodriquez, on Behalf of His Heirs- At-Law v. The United States of America, Days Flying Service, Inc., Liberty Aviation, Inc. & Manuel Diaz. Joyce Thomas, Administratrix of the Estate of Haynesly S. Thomas v. United States of America, Liberty Aviation, Inc., and Manuel Diaz v. Noelia Rodriquez, Administratrix of the Estate of Carlos A. Rodriquez, and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of Carlos A. Rodriquez, on Behalf of His Heirs- At-Law. Appeal of United States of America, in No. 86-5099. Appeal of Noelia Rodriquez and Joyce Thomas, In
In support of this proposition, the government relies on numerous cases holding that "the primary responsibility for avoiding collision ... in VFR conditions is with the pilot." In re N-500L Cases, 691 F.2d at 28 ; see also, e.g., Murff v. United States, 785 F.2d 552, 554 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 95 , 93 L.Ed.2d 46 (1986); Kack v. United States, 570 F.2d 754, 756 (8th Cir.1978); Tilley v. United States, 375 F.2d at 682-83 ; United States v. Miller, 303 F.2d 703, 710 (9th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 507 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); United S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murff, Administrator of the Estate of Murff
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-2040.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.