green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Maroun
But see United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 790-93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986) (where multiple currency transactions totalling more than $10,000 in a single day at a single bank, conviction upheld); United States v. Amer *687 ican Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., 879 F.2d 1087, 1094-1100 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 368 , 107 L.Ed.2d 354 (1989); United States v. Richeson, 825 F.2d 17, 19-20 (4th Cir.1987); United States v. Tobon-Builes, 706 F.2d 1092, 1096-1101 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Thompson, 603 F.2d 1200, 1202-0…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. McMorris
(2×)
the reason for independent appellate review of constitutional facts is 'he scope of constitutional protections, representing the basic value commitments of our society, cannot vary from trial court to trial court, or from jury to jury.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Haught
the fact that in almost all cases the search will be undertaken at the place of arrest is, as a practical matter, likely to overcome any problems as to temporal proximity
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Nunez
See State v. Vaughn, 199 Conn. 557, 565 , 508 A.2d 430 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S. Ct. 583 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. State
(2×)
See generally United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245 (2nd Cir.), cert denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986) (applying Strickland, to defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim where defendant had absconded prior to trial and trial counsel’s participation was limited to objection to trial in absentia and a flight instruction and to moving for judgment of acquittal); Warner v. Ford, 752 F.2d 622 (11th Cir.1985) (applying Strickland to defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, where trial counsel’s participation was limited to a motion for a dire…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacobs
However, “[b]eeause a law enforcement officer promises something to a person suspected of a crime in exchange for *DCLXXII the person’s speaking about the crime does not automatically render inadmissible any statement obtained as a result of that promise.” United States v. Walton, 10 F.3d 1024, 1028 (3d Cir.1993); see Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 604-08 (3d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied sub nom., Miller v. Neubert, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Templin
Accord Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 604 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 251 (2d Cir.) ("Our review of the district judge's exercise of discretion ... must be based on the relevant circumstances confronting the judge at the time of his ruling, without the benefit of hindsight."), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Prince
See Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 605 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Bowen v. State
See United States v. Kelton, 791 F.2d 101 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 251 (2d Cir.) (“Our review of the district judge’s exercise of discretion ... must be based on the relevant circumstances confronting the judge at the time of his ruling, without the benefit of hind sight.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 251 (2d Cir.) (“Our review of the district judge’s exercise of discretion ... must be based on the relevant circumstances confronting the judge at the time of his ruling, without the benefit of hindsight.”), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Greer
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 251 (2d Cir.) ("Our review of the district judge's exercise of discretion . . . must be based on the relevant circumstances confronting the judge at the time of his ruling, without the benefit of hindsight."), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Felice
See Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 611 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Caban
(2×)
See State v. Fry, 131 Wis. 2d 153, 171-76 , 388 N.W.2d 565, 573-75 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
George Villanueva v. Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
See United States v. Sanchez 790 F.2d 245, 250 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 479 U.S. 989 (1986); United States v. Tortora, 464 F.2d 1202, 1210 (2d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giampa
Where voluntariness is concerned, “the question in each case is whether the defendant’s will was overborne at the time he [or she] confessed.” Haynes v. Washington, 373 U.S. 503, 513 , 83 S.Ct. 1336, 1343 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963); see Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528, 534 , 83 S.Ct. 917, 920 , 9 L.Ed.2d 922 (1963). ‘Whether a confession is a product of coercion may only be determined after a careful evaluation of the totality of all the surrounding circumstances.... ” United States v. Anderson, 929 F.2d 96, 99 (2d Cir.1991); see Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 604 (3d Cir.) (“To det…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flynn
(2×)
See State v. Fry, 131 Wis. 2d 153, 171-176 , 388 N.W.2d 565, 573-575 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 . [3-5] As the trial court recognized in its well-reasoned oral opinion, under the Fourth Amendment, a warrantless entry and search is presumptively unreasonable.
cited
Cited "see"
Albert Ray Beam v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prison-Boise
See State v. Scroggins, 110 Idaho 380 , 716 P.2d 1152, 1161 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 582 , 93 L.Ed.2d 585 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. McClinton
See Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 612 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard W. Miller
See Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 737-39 , 89 S.Ct. 1420, 1423-24 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969). “[A]s long as th[e] decision is a product of the suspect’s own balancing of competing considerations, the confession is voluntary.” Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 605 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986) (citations omitted) [hereinafter Miller II].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry R. Watkins
(2×)
Accord United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 250 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Albert Ray Beam v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prison-Boise
See State v. Scroggins, 110 Idaho 380 , 716 P.2d 1152, 1161 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 582 , 93 L.Ed.2d 585 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Durkin
If unaccompanied by a justification in the nature of “ ‘good cause’ ”; State v. Gonzalez, 205 Conn. 673, 688 , 535 A.2d 345 (1987); see United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 249 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S. Ct. 584 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Francesco Polizzi v. United States
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 250 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986) (where defendant failed to appear at trial, and defense counsel acknowledged that “there is no evidence where [Sanchez] is”, the district court did not err in finding a voluntary waiver by defendant of his right to be present).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Flores
See State v. Carter, 131 Wis. 2d 69, 78 , 389 N.W.2d 1, 4 , cert denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986). 3 Counsel's failure to allow Flores to read the PSI is not a violation of his due process rights.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony P. MacKey Appeal of Sean M. Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 250 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Tortora, 464 F.2d 1202, 1210 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1063 , 93 S.Ct. 554 , 34 L.Ed.2d 516 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Di Frisco
(2×)
See Miller v. Fenton, 796 F. 2d 598, 605 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 587 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Alonso Ramirez, and Zeir Marulanda
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kimes v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 250-51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Fontanez
(2×)
See United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 250 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Tortora, 464 F.2d 1202, 1210 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1063 , 93 S.Ct. 554 , 34 L.Ed.2d 516 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Murdock
(2×)
See State v. Fry, 131 Wis. 2d 153, 171, 175 , 388 N.W.2d 565, 573 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986). 1 I.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Childs
See Miller v. Fenton, 741 F.2d 1456 , 1470 n. 3 (3rd Cir. 1984) (Gibbons, J. dissenting), rev’d, 474 U.S. 104 (1985), on remand, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Patterson
See, e.g., State v. Smith , supra, 107 Conn.App. at 671 , 946 A.2d 319 (distinction that defendant was only individual wearing a red shirt did not make photographic array unnecessarily suggestive); see also State v. Vaughn , 199 Conn. 557 , 564, 508 A.2d 430 ("[a]ny array composed of different individuals must necessarily contain certain differences"), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 583 , 93 L.Ed.2d 585 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yannai
“A defendant who deliberately fails to appear in court does so voluntarily,” and “his absence can be considered a ‘knowing’ waiver.” United States v. Tortora, 464 F.2d 1202, 1208 (2d Cir.) (“Tortora”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1063 , 93 S.Ct. 554 , 34 L.Ed.2d 516 (1972); see, e.g., United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 248-50 (2d Cir.) (“Sanchez”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Pastor, 557 F.2d 930, 933-34 (2d Cir.1977) (“Pastor”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sparkman v. State
Thus, Stroud “still controls cases in which such seizures are prompted by reasonable justification.” Brown, 878 F.2d at 225 . “[BJecause of their reasonable concern for prison security and inmates’ diminished expectations of privacy, prison officials do not violate the constitution when they read inmates’ outgoing letters.” Id.; see also United States v. Kelton, 791 F.2d 101, 102-03 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 583 , 93 L.Ed.2d 586 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Randolph
The rest I have. “[Defense Counsel]: When you say the one on the bottom, which one? “[Antonaras]: To the right side, right there, number eight. “[Defense Counsel]: You’re indicating number eight? *383 “[Antonaras]: Number eight,. “[Defense Counsel]: So, of the eight, only number eight had never been in there before? “[Antonaras]: Exactly. “[Defense Counsel]: And you realized that right away? “[Antonaras]: Naturally.” 17 Antonios Antonaras was unable to make a positive identification of the perpetrator, but he recognized the individuals depicted in the array as customers of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brunton
See, e.g., State v. Carter, 131 Wis. 2d 69, 78-79 , 389 N.W.2d 1, 4 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 (1986) (withdrawal of guilty plea); State v. Flores, 158 Wis. 2d 636, 642 , 462 N.W.2d 899, 901 (Ct. App. 1990) (claim of due process violation in sentencing process), overruled in part by State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509 , 484 N.W.2d 540 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Veilleux
See, e.g., Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 603-04 (3rd Cir.) (citing cases), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Debra Sue Jenner v. James Smith, Superintendent, Springfield Correctional Facility Roger Tellinghuisen, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
See, e.g., Miller v. Fenton, 796 F.2d 598, 607 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); Martin v. Wainwright, 770 F.2d 918, 925-27 (11th Cir.1985). “[Tjhere is nothing inherently wrong with efforts to create a favorable climate for confession.” Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1140 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Whalen
Thus, Stroud “still controls cases in which such seizures are prompted by reasonable justification.” Brown, 878 F.2d at 225 . “[BJecause of their reasonable concern for prison security and inmates’ diminished expectations of privacy, prison officials do not violate the constitution when they read inmates’ outgoing letters.” Id.; see also United States v. Kelton, 791 F.2d 101, 102-03 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 583 , 93 L.Ed.2d 586 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin Houtchens
Compare United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 251 (2d Cir.) (“district judges must have broad discretion in determining whether to proceed with a trial in absentia ”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986), with United States v. Hernandez, 842 F.2d 82, 85 (5th Cir.1988) (court has only “narrow discretion” to proceed with trial when defendant is voluntarily absent), and Brown, 507 F.2d at 189 (considering only whether defendant waived right to be present at trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hudson
See, e.g., United States v. Sanchez, 790 F. 2d 245 (2d Cir.) (affirming defendant’s conviction in absentia where defendant present at pretrial conference when trial date set), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); Brewer v. Raines, 670 F. 2d 117 (9th Cir.1982) (interpreting Arizona law as permitting defendant to waive right to be present before trial commences, provided sufficient notice is given); Virgin Islands v. Brown, 507 F.2d 186 (3d Cir.1975) (affirming conviction in absentia where defendant notified by subpoena of trial date); United States v. Miller, 46…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles D. Scanio
See, e.g., United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 790-93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Thompson, 603 F.2d 1200, 1202-04 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Tobon-Builes, 706 F.2d 1092, 1096-1101 (11th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294, 1309-15 (2d Cir.) (applying law in effect prior to January 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 957 , 958, 108 S.Ct. 355 , 357, 98 L.Ed.2d 380, 382 (1987), 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1018 , 98 L.Ed.2d 983 (1988); United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., 879 F.2d 10…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lacey
See also United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245, 249 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., John J. Bruno, John W. Mendicino, Charles Krzywicki, Alan Zytnick, Louis J. Pecori. Appeal of John J. Bruno. The United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., John J. Bruno, John W. Mendicino, Charles Krzywicki, Alan Zytnick, Louis J. Pecori. Appeal of John W. Mendicino. The United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., John J. Bruno, John W. Mendicino, Charles Krzywicki, Alan Zytnick, Louis J. Pecori. Appeal of Alan Zytnick. The United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., John J. Bruno, John W. Mendicino, Charles Krzywicki, Alan Zytnick, Louis J. Pecori. Appeal of American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc. The United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., John J. Bruno, John W. Mendicino, Charles Krzywicki, Alan Zytnick, Louis J. Pecori. Appeal of Charles Krzywicki
And in such a case, of course, only the person who willfully causes the forbidden act to be done is guilty of the crime. 30 (Emphasis added.) Id. at 73; see also United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986) (Sec. 2(b) holds criminally liable, without regard to guilt or innocence of intermediary, those causing others to commit crimes). 31 The cases which have addressed the issue of "2(b) or not 2(b)" liability in the context of the Currency Reporting Act raise more questions than they answer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice Sacharczyk
As the Seventh Circuit has recently noted, “these circuits have read the regulations requiring financial institutions to report each ‘physical transfer’ of currency in excess of $10,000 to mean that a financial institution must aggregate all transactions by one customer on one day.” Gimbel, 830 F.2d at 625 ; see Tobon-Builes, 706 F.2d at 1098-99 (multiple exchanges made at same branch on same day); United States v. Thompson, 603 F.2d 1200, 1202-03 (5th Cir.1979) (same); see also United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 792 (2d Cir.) (suggesting same requirements), cert. denied, 479 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc.
(Emphasis added.) Id. at 73; see also United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986) (§ 2(b) holds criminally liable, without regard to guilt or innocence of intermediary, those causing others to commit crimes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scanio
See also United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 792 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Tota, 672 F.Supp. 716, 722 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (adequacy of former statutes to state “criminality of structuring”), aff 'd mem. sub nom., United States v. Fahmy, 847 F.2d 836 (2d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillip L. Segal
Moreover, an “aider and abettor can be punished for conspiring with members of a particular group that is the subject of a criminal prohibition.” Hayes, 827 F.2d at 473 ; see also United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 792 (2d Cir.) (where financial institution required to file CTRs, a customer may be held criminally liable for willfully causing financial institution not to file CTRs), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Thompson, 603 F.2d 1200, 1203 (5th Cir.1979) (individuals, including customers, may be liable for knowing failure to file …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scroggins
v.
Idaho
v.
Idaho
No. 86-5184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Wisconsin Supreme Court (2) · Idaho Court of Appeals (1)
Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari denied.