green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. Myton
See Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah (Ute III), 773 F.2d 1087, 1088-89, 1093 (10th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Myton
See Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah (Ute III), 773 F.2d 1087, 1088-89, 1093 (10th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
(2×)
The Ute Indian Tribe suggests that “the legal status of the non-opened lands on the Uintah Valley Reservation and all of the lands on the Uncompahgre Reservation remain[s] as established by the Tenth Circuit in Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 773 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 [, 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 ] (1986).” Brief of Ute Indian Tribe, at 2 n. 4; see id. at 15 n. 19.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cuch
See Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 521 F.Supp. 1072 (D.Utah 1981), aff'd in pertinent part, 773 F.2d 1087 , 1089 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), modifying 716 F.2d 1298 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Robert Benbrook, Jr. And Steven Dwain Sexton
See United States v. Capote-Capote, 946 F.2d 1100, 1104 (5th Cir.1991) ("Weapons in the home may facilitate a drug crime because the defendant could use the guns to protect the drugs.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2278 , 119 L.Ed.2d 204 (1992). 20 . 794 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Perank
(3×)
See Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 773 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hagen
See Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 773 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins, Jr., Morten Hopkins, and John W. Harrell
See United States v. Osgood, 794 F.2d 1087, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Belton v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Osgood, 794 F.2d 1087, 1094 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986); United States v. Treadwell, 245 U.S.App.D.C. 257, 263 , 760 F.2d 327, 333 (1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coando
See Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 521 F.Supp. 1072, 1188 (D.Utah 1981), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 716 F.2d 1298 (10th Cir.1983), reh’g 773 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. State of New Mexico
Id. at 475-76 , 104 S.Ct. at 1168-69; accord Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 773 F.2d 1087, 1092 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siercks v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Osgood, 794 F.2d 1087, 1095 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986); [United States u] Harrell , 737 F.2d [971] 978-79 [ (11th Cir.1984) ].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Osgood, 794 F.2d 1087, 1095 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986); [United States v.] Harrell, 737 F.2d [971] 978-79 [ (11th Cir.1984) ].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jenks
Scott v. Carew, 196 U.S. 100 , 25 S.Ct. 193 , 49 L.Ed. 403 (1905); see also Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 716 F.2d 1298, 1305 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1983) (creation of an Indian reservation or a forest or other particular use from public land removes it from the public domain).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. Brunt
See also Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 716 F.2d 1298, 1301 (trial conclusions are “persuasive,” but not considered factual findings) (10th Cir.1983), rev’d in part and aff'd in part en banc, 773 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir.1985) (no discussion of standard of review), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yolanda Sanchez Defundora
The lay testimony and circumstantial evidence relevant to determining the identity of a substance includes: “ ‘evidence of the physical appearance of the substance involved in the transaction, evidence that the substance produced the expected effects when sampled by someone familiar with the illicit drug, evidence that the substance was used in the same manner as the illicit drug, testimony that a high price was paid in cash for the substance, evidence that transactions involving the substance were carried on with secrecy or deviousness, and evidence that the substance was called by the na…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Schrock
See, e.g., United States v. Osgood, 794 F.2d 1087, 1095 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986); Harrell, 737 F.2d at 978-79 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Country v. State of Oklahoma
See John, 437 U.S. at 652-53 , 98 S.Ct. at 2550-51 ; see also Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 773 F.2d 1087 , 1089 n. 1 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986). "[I]t is Congress' intent that must govern our decision." Id.; cf. Solem, 465 U.S. at 479 n. 23, 104 S.Ct. at 1170 n. 23 (State courts assumed that opened areas of reservation fell within their general jurisdiction; Supreme Court held that reservation boundaries not diminished). 24 As recounted above, the country in the Indian Territory provided for the Creek Nation was granted to it in f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
See John, 437 U.S. at 652-53 , 98 S.Ct. at 2550-51 ; see also Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 773 F.2d 1087, 1089 n. 1 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 596 , 93 L.Ed.2d 596 (1986). “[I]t is Congress’ intent that must govern our decision.” Id.; cf. Solem, 465 U.S. at 479 n. 23, 104 S.Ct. at 1170 n. 23 (State courts assumed that opened areas of reservation fell within their general jurisdiction; Supreme Court held that reservation boundaries not diminished).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kinnell
v.
United States District Court Judges
v.
United States District Court Judges
No. 86-5709.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.