green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Sequa Capital Corp. v. Nave
(2×)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 356 (2d Cir.1986) (where attachment under CPLR 6201 would have been unavailable, court affirmed issuance of injunction imposing a constructive trust on properties which were part of the underlying claims and where money damages were not requested), cert. dismissed, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 2178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 835 ; In re Feit & Drexler, Inc., 760 F.2d 406, 416 (2d Cir.1985) (where there was danger that defendant would dissipate her assets in an action for money damages, court …
discussed
Cited "see"
Lines v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
(2×)
DISCUSSION Plaintiff relies upon equitable principals of quasi-contract, money had and received, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, which, under New York law, 1 permit a plaintiff to recover money when it has come into the defendant’s hands wrongfully and it is, under the circumstances, “against good conscience for the defendant to keep the money.” Parsa v. State, 64 N.Y.2d 143, 148 , 474 N.E.2d 235, 237 , 485 N.Y.S.2d 27, 29 (1984) (discussing action for money had and received) (quotations omitted); see Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 355 (2d Cir.1986), cert. dis…
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips Mercantile Co. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department
(2×)
See K Mart Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 111 Idaho 719 , 727 P.2d 1147 (1986), appeal dismissed, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 (1987); Deere & Co. v. Allphin, 49 111.
discussed
Cited "see"
William Wrigley Jr. Company v. Eric Waters
(2×)
Bankers Security Life Insurance Society v. Shakerdge, 49 N.Y.2d 939 , 406 N.E.2d 440 , 428 N.Y.S.2d 623, 624 (1980); Sharp v. Kosmalski, 40 N.Y.2d 119, 121 , 351 N.E.2d 721, 723 , 386 N.Y.S.2d 72, 75 (1976). 2 Brand v. Brand, 811 F.2d 74, 77 (2d Cir.1987); see Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 , 355 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 (1987); United States v. Rivieccio, 661 F.Supp. 281, 291-93 (E.D.N.Y.1987). 3 It should be noted that although these factors may be used as guidelines, in many cases a constructive trust may be imposed without…
discussed
Cited "see"
William Wrigley Jr. Co. v. Waters
(2×)
Brand v. Brand, 811 F.2d 74, 77 (2d Cir. 1987); see Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 355 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 (1987); United States v. Rivieccio, 661 F.Supp. 281, 291-93 (E.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Citibank, N.A. v. Nyland (Cf8) Ltd., the Republic of the Philippines, New York Land Company A/K/A Great Neckers Realty, Inc.
(2×)
See New York Land Co. v. Republic of the Philippines, 634 F.Supp. 279 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff 'd., 806 F.2d 344 (2d Cir.1986), cert. dismissed, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury
See K Mart Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 111 Idaho 719 , 727 P.2d 1147 (1986), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 (1987); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Woods, supra, 708 S.W.2d 374 ; K Mart Corp. v. S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koffman v. Smith
(2×)
Ass’n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 , 355 (2d Cir.1986) (“constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship”) (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc.
(2×)
Ass’n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 355 (2d Cir.1986) (“constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship”) (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.
(2×)
Ass'n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 , 355 (2d Cir.1986) ("constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship") (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 1048 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc. (In re Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A.)
(2×)
Ass’n, 743 F.Supp. 176, 179-80 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (constructive trust imposed, applying New York law, despite absence of fiduciary relationship); SEC v. Levine, 689 F.Supp. 317, 321-23 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.1989); see also Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344, 355 (2d Cir.1986) (“constructive trust is simply a remedy to prevent unjust enrichment and may or may not involve a fiduciary relationship”) (citing Restatement of Restitution § 160 comment a (1937)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 , 481 U.S. 10…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cooper
v.
Eugene School District No. 4J
v.
Eugene School District No. 4J
No. 86-701.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1987.
Brennan, Jurisdiction, Marshall, Set, Would.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ore. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice O’Connor would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.