green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…rule lob-5, however, is not read literally. instead, a defendant's omission to state a material fact is proscribed only when the defendant has a duty to disclose.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…standing idly by while knowing that one's good name is being used to perpetrate a fraud is inherently misleading
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Paul J. Pyles v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
nless a person has performed services for the employer under that employer's supervision he is not an employee for purposes of the rla.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re ZZZZ Best Securities Litigation
(2×)
standing idly by while knowing that one's good name is being used to perpetrate a fraud is inherently misleading
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Cascade International Securities Litigation
(2×)
rule lob-5, however, is not read literally. instead, a defendant's omission to state a material fact is proscribed only when the defendant has a duty to disclose.
cited
Cited "see"
Mendiola v. State
See United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 958 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987); Barley, 906 S.W.2d at 33-34 . 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth Leon Mendiola v. State
App. 1995) (citations and footnotes omitted), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 1176 (1996). 2: Goldberg v. State , 95 S.W.3d 345, 378 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1190 (2004). 3: Barley, 906 S.W.2d at 34 . 4: Moore v. State , 140 S.W.3d 720, 731 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, pet. ref’d) (citing Simmons v. United States , 390 U.S. 377, 383 , 88 S. Ct. 967, 971 (1968), and Brown v. State , 64 S.W.3d 94, 99 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.)). 5: See United States v. Merkt , 794 F.2d 950, 958 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 (1987); Barley , 906 S.W…
discussed
Cited "see"
Digital Properties, Inc. v. City of Plantation
(2×)
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040, 1042 (11th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987); Halliburton & Assocs., Inc. v. Henderson, New & Co., 774 F.2d 441, 444 (11th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allard v. Arthur Andersen & Co.(USA)
(2×)
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir.), reh’g denied, 806 F.2d 1070 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
(2×)
See generally Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir.) (vacating district court’s dismissal of securities fraud claims against AA by DRLP limited partners and DRLP liquidating trustee), reh’g denied, 806 F.2d 1070 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987); Judith Cummings, An Audit Under Fire, N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walco Investments, Inc. v. Thenen
(2×)
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040, 1043 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
(2×)
See Wilson v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 803 F.2d 563, 565 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987) (cited in Wildman at 1396.) Congress has not so expressly elaborated with § 1983.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafique Aslam
See United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 953 (5th Cir.1986) (applying former section 1324(a)(1) to defendant who met aliens on United States side of Mexican border and brought them to a sanctuary), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Stevens
See United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 958 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantis Group, Inc. v. Rospatch Corp.
(2×)
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987); Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rospatch Securities Litigation
(2×)
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987); Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Lynn Young v. Robert Herring, Lee County Sheriff
(2×)
See United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 958 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987) (photo array in which the accused's photo was the only one in black and white and was the only Caucasian, while the others were color photos of Hispanic men, was impermissibly suggestive); Swicegood v. Alabama, 577 F.2d 1322, 1327 (5th Cir.1977) (a considerable age difference between the accused and the other men depicted in a photo array was a significant factor in finding the array impermissibly suggestive); United States v. Gidley, 527 F.2d 1345, 1350 (5th Cir.) …
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International
In arriving at this conclusion, the court observed that “RLA coverage is determined by the work the person performs under supervision of the employer.” Id. at 846; accord Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. United Airlines, 802 F.2d 886, 913 (7th Cir.1986) (“unless a person has performed services for the employer under that employer’s supervision he is not an employee for purposes of the RLA”), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1605 , 94 L.Ed.2d 791 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-Appellees
See Grubbs, 870 F.2d at 345 ; accord County of Orange v. Air California, 799 F.2d 535, 537 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1605 , 94 L.Ed.2d 791 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A. v. Meese
See United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 964 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987); United States v. Pereira-Pineda, 721 F.2d 137, 139 (5th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Meese
See United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040, 1045 (11th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040, 1045 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987). 26 Peat, Marwick relies on Barker v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, 797 F.2d 490 (7th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dallas Wildman v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
See Wilson v. Burlington N. R.R., 803 F.2d 563 , 563 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Michigan Power Company v. Department of Energy and United States of America, Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), Intervenors
(2×)
See, e.g., Tennessee v. Herrington, 806 F.2d 642, 648 (6th Cir.1986) (“[T]he overall structure of the Act does reveal a consistent concern for timely implementation of the disposal provisions.”), cer t. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Hurt
A violation of a non-defendant's Fifth Amendment rights may constitute a violation of the defendant's right to a fair trial, however, "when the government seeks a conviction through use of evidence obtained by extreme coercion or torture." Chiavola, 744 F.2d at 1273 ; see also United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 961-62 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 (1987); LaFrance v. Bohlinger, 499 F.2d 29, 34 (1st Cir.1974); Bradford v. Johnson, 476 F.2d 66 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam), aff'g 354 F.Supp. 1331 (E.D.Mich.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
(2×)
See, e.g., Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987); Griggs v. Hinds Junior College, 563 F.2d 179 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Russell Mikalajunas, Jr.
Compare Mitchell, 886 F.2d at 671 (stating that bias must be extra-judicial), and United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950, 960 (5th Cir. 1986) (same), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 (1987), and United States v. Sammons, 918 F.2d 592, 599 (6th Cir. 1990) (same), and United States v. Monaco, 852 F.2d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 1988) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1040 (1989), and McWhorter v. Birmingham, 906 F.2d 674 , 678 (11th Cir. 1990) (same), with United States v. Chantal, 902 F.2d 1018, 1022 (1st Cir. 1990) (holding that judge may be disqualified for case-based bias).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Heim
See also County of Orange v. Air California, 799 F.2d 535, 537 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., Irvine v. County of Orange, 480 U.S. 946 (1987); Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, 572 F.2d 657, 659 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Beaver v. Alaniz, 439 U.S. 837 (1978). 7 The present litigation was pending at the time Custom Wellhead negotiated the purchase of the notes.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc.
(2×)
Where some special duty of disclosure exists, then liability should be possible with a lesser degree of scienter.") (footnote omitted); see also Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 , 1045 n. 7 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc.
(2×)
Where some special duty of disclosure exists, then liability should be possible with a lesser degree of scienter.’’) (footnote omitted); see also Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 , 1045 n. 7 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Del Socorro Pardo Viuda De Aguilar, United States of America v. Anthony Clark, A/K/A Antonio Clark, United States of America v. Sister Darlene Nicgorski, School Sisters of Saint Francis, United States of America v. Philip M. Willis-Conger, A/K/A Phillip M. Conger, United States of America v. John M. Fife, United States of America v. Margaret Jean Hutchison, A/K/A Peggy Hutchison, United States of America v. Wendy Lewin, United States of America v. Ramon Dagoberto Quinones
The court rejected this defense. 7 Id. at 273 ; see also United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950 , 965 n. 18 (5th Cir.1986) (reaffirmation by different panel of Merkt I's rejection of this defense), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. de Aguilar
The court rejected this defense. 7 Id. at 273 ; see also United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950 , 965 n. 18 (5th Cir.1986) (reaffirmation by different panel of Merkt I’s rejection of this defense), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Aguilar
The court rejected this defense. 7 Id. at 273 ; see also United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950 , 965 n. 18 (5th Cir.1986) (reaffirmation by different panel of Merkt I’s rejection of this defense), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Del Socorro Pardo Viuda De Aguilar, United States of America v. Anthony Clark, A/K/A Antonio Clark, United States of America v. Sister Darlene Nicgorski, School Sisters of Saint Francis, United States of America v. Philip M. Willis-Conger, A/K/A Phillip M. Conger, United States of America v. John M. Fife, United States of America v. Margaret Jean Hutchison, A/K/A Peggy Hutchison, United States of America v. Wendy Lewin, United States of America v. Ramon Dagoberto Quinones
The court rejected this defense. 7 Id. at 273 ; see also United States v. Merkt, 794 F.2d 950 , 965 n. 18 (5th Cir.1986) (reaffirmation by different panel of Merkt I's rejection of this defense), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946 , 107 S.Ct. 1603 , 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Nevada, States of Wisconsin, Mississippi and Utah, Intervenors v. John Herrington, Secretary of the Department of Energy, Department of Ecology of the State of Washington v. John Herrington, Secretary of the Department of Energy
See also Tennessee v. Herrington, 806 F.2d 642 , 651 n. 9 (6th Cir.1986) (discussing DOE's section 10137 obligations), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nevada v. Herrington
See also Tennessee v. Herrington, 806 F.2d 642 , 651 n. 9 (6th Cir.1986) (discussing DOE’s section 10137 obligations), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1604 , 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chuidian
v.
Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County (Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp., Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County (Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp., Real Party in Interest)
No. 86-1292.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1987.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.