green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.7 score
“the substantial and continuing contacts set out herein indicate the base of operations was in the united states, and outweighs any interest which might be served by litigating this case in mexican courts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rojas v. KLOSTER CRUISE, A/S
the substantial and continuing contacts set out herein indicate the base of operations was in the united states, and outweighs any interest which might be served by litigating this case in mexican courts.
discussed
Cited "see"
Egiazaryan v. Zalmayev
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 147 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Bourne of N.Y.C, Inc. v. AmBase Corp., 150 F.R.D. 465, 472 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 147 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Bourne of N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation
(2×)
The Qualified Reporter’s Privilege Applies to The Publications Before the Court applies the test to the facts of a particular case, it “must first determine whether the [party claiming privilege] has met his threshold burden of establishing the elements of a privileged relationship.” SEC v. Seahawk Deep Ocean Tech., 166 F.R.D. 268, 270 (D.Conn.1996); see von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.) (“It is axiomatic that the burden is on a party claiming the protection of a privilege to establish those facts that are the essential elements of the privileged relationship.”), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Fibermark, Inc.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James J. Schreckengost
See Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 94 L.Ed.2d 538 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gulf Islands Leasing, Inc. v. Bombardier Capital, Inc.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 147 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Bowne, 150 F.R.D. at 472 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Viacom, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.
(2×)
See von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Federation Internationale De Basketball
(2×)
See von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rapkin v. Rocque
(2×)
See von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
(2×)
See State v. Chirpich, Minn. Ct.App., 392 N.W.2d 34 , 37 *1147 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (holding Minnesota DUI statute requiring that test be within two hours of driving was not unconstitutionally overbroad because “driving while under the influence is not constitutionally protected conduct”); Sereika v. State, Nev.Supr., 114 Nev. 175 , 955 P.2d 175, 180 (1998) (holding that Nevada’s DUI statute requiring the test be obtained within two hours was not constitutionally overbroad in rising BAC cases because the state has a legitimate inter…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Rosenberger
(2×)
See Karvelis v. Constellation Lines SA, 608 F.Supp. 966, 972 (S.D.N.Y.1985), affirmed, 806 F.2d 49 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Dow Chemical Co.
(2×)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5), Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments; see von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Bennett v. Fieser, 1994 WL 542089 , *3 (D.Kan.1994).
examined
Cited "see"
Thomas Fashauer, Jr. v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc
(4×)
See Karvelis v. Constellation Lines S.A., 806 F.2d 49 , 52-53 & n. 2 (2d Cir.1986) (approving jury instruction charging that both plaintiff and defendant are required to act with reasonable care), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Brown v. OMI Corp., 863 F.Supp. 169, 170-71 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (applying reasonable care standard to defendant's contributory negligence claims). 55 To be sure, Fashauer's contention derives support from a series of Jones Act cases decided in the Fifth Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fashauer v. NJ Trans Rail
See Karvelis v. Constellation Lines S.A., 806 F.2d 49 , 52-53 & n.2 (2d Cir. 1986) (approving jury instruction charging that both plaintiff and defendant are required to act with reasonable care), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 (1987); Brown v. OMI Corp., 863 F. Supp. 169, 170-71 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (applying reasonable care standard to defendant's contributory negligence claims).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 146 (2d Cir.) (burden is on party claiming protection of attorney-client), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.1973) (burden is on party claiming protection of any privilege), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); People v. Mitchell, 58 N.Y.2d 368 , 461 N.Y.S.2d 267, 269-70 , 448 N.E.2d 121, 123 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); PPM America, Inc. v. Marriott Corp., 152 F.R.D. 32, 34 (S.D.N.Y.1993); Duttle v. Bandler & Kass, 127 F.R.D. 46, 51-52 (S.D.N.Y.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bieter Company
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136 , 141 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); see also Hansen v. Allen Memorial Hosp., 141 F.R.D. 115, 121 (S.D.Iowa 1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Olmscheid
(2×)
See State, City of Mankato v. Chirpich, 392 N.W.2d 34, 37 (Minn.App.1986), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Oct. 17, 1986), cert. denied 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136,146 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (quoting United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 922 (2d Cir.1961)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Church of Scientology Celebrity Center International v. Internal Revenue Service
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Stickels v. General Rental Co., Inc.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See von Bulow (By Auersperg) v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 142-44 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, Reynolds v. von Bulow, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); LaRouche v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 780 F.2d 1134, 1139 (4th Cir.1986); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 710-15 (D.C.Cir.1981); Miller v. Transamerican Press, Inc., 621 F.2d 721, 724-27 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041 , 101 S.Ct. 1759 , 68 L.Ed.2d 238 (1981); Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co., 633 F.2d 583, 594-99 (1st Cir.1980); Riley v. City of Chester, 612 F.2d 708, 714-18 (3d Cir.1979); Gi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Don King Productions, Inc. v. Douglas
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 143 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (noting that privilege did not depend upon confidentiality of relationship between reporter and source with out addressing appropriateness of extension of privilege by other cited courts to non-confidential information)', United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76 (2d Cir.1983) (noting importance of preserving confidentiality of journalists’ sources).
discussed
Cited "see"
Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1988) (proponent of privilege has burden).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gazis v. John S. Latsis (USA) Inc.
(2×)
See Karvelis v. Constellation Lines, S.A., 608 F.Supp. 966, 969-71 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff 'd, 806 F.2d 49, 52 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (holding "operator” of a ship liable under the Jones Act despite fact that another defendant had admitted it was the “owner”). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp.
(2×)
See Von Bulow v. Von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141-42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duttle v. Bandler & Kass
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trevor Dennis
(2×)
See von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136 , 146-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Haynes
(2×)
Bowne, 150 F.R.D. at 474 (citations omitted); see also von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136 , 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dtd.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Comprehensive Habilitation Services, Inc. v. Commerce Funding Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.1987), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Granite Partners v. Bear, Stearns & Co., 184 F.R.D. 49, 52 (S.D.N.Y.1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
HPD Laboratories, Inc. v. Clorox Co.
(2×)
See Pearson, 211 F.3d at 66 (applying federal law to resolve discovery dispute over material relevant to federal and state claims); see also von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied by Reynolds v. von Bulow, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (observing that courts consistently apply federal law when evidence is relevant to federal and state claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. Tow Boat Serv. & Management, Inc., 66 F.3d 336 (9th Cir.1995) (unpublished) (rejecting “slight care” standard); see also Karvelis v. Constellation Lines, S.A, 806 F.2d 49 , 52-53 & n. 2 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987), (approving jury instruction informing that both employer and employee under Jones Act are charged with duty of reasonable care under the circumstances); Ybarra v. Burlington N., Inc., 689 F.2d 147, 150 (8th Cir.1982) (approving jury instruction that railroad has duty to exercise reasonable care for prote…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gold Coast Publications, Inc. v. State
(2×)
See also von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136 , 145 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Reynolds v. von Bulow, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); United States v. LaRouche Campaign, 841 F.2d 1176 (1st Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harpal Singh Ahluwalia
(2×)
See, e.g., Shaw v. Winters, 796 F.2d 1124, 1126 (9th Cir.1986) (no due process violation where government supplied food stamps in sting operation), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hansen v. Allen Memorial Hospital
(2×)
See, e.g., von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom., Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Pinkard v. Johnson, 118 F.R.D. 517, 520 (M.D.Ala.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lipinski v. Skinner
(2×)
See, e.g., von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (reasoning that “[i]n exámining the boundaries of the journalist’s privilege, we may consider also the applicable state law, in this case New York’s so-called ‘Shield Law,’ N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parsons v. Watson
(2×)
See, e.g., von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 142 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 583 F.Supp. 427, 432 (E.D.Mo.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dubois v. Gradco Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Polycast, 129 F.R.D. at 629 ; see also von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.1987) (proponent of privilege has burden of establishing those facts that are the essential elements of the privilege), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Markiewicz
(2×)
See, e.g., von Bulow by Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 142 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 583 F.Supp. 427, 432 (E.D.Mo.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adam
v.
Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada
v.
Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada
No. 86-1367.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1987.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.