green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…he erisa scheme envisions that employers will act in a dual capacity as both fiduciary to the plan and as employer. erisa does not prohibit an employer from acting in accordance with its interests as employer when not administering the plan or investing its assets.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak Co.
the erisa scheme envisions that employers will act in a dual capacity as both fiduciary to the plan and employer
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Steelworkers of America, Local 2116, Russell Whisman, Darrell Tucker, G.R. Jones, and David Jewell v. Cyclops Corporation
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
he erisa scheme envisions that employers will act in a dual capacity as both fiduciary to the plan and as employer. erisa does not prohibit an employer from acting in accordance with its interests as employer when not administering the plan or investing its assets.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.
Similarly, the Eleventh Circuit has held that “ERISA simply does not prohibit a company from eliminating previously offered benefits that are neither vested nor accrued.” Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1471 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 5.Ct. 1893, 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Gervasoni v. State
See Johnson v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 938 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1894 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alabama Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Marshall County Treatment Center
See Adams v. Board of Trustees of the University of South Alabama, 676 So.2d 1326, 1328 (Ala.Civ.App.1996) (citing Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464 , 1472 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987)) (stating that a party may not “lie in wait and raise the issue of recusal after learning the outcome of the proceeding”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flowers v. State
See Johnson v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 938 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, Duggar v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1894 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987). . §§ 775.0825, 777.04(1), (4), 782.04, 784.07(3), Fla.Stat. (1989). . §§ 775.0823(5), 787.01(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989). . § 944.40, Fla.Stat. (1989). . § 775.0875, Fla.Stat. (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Blaw Knox Retirement Income Plan v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.
See Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1471 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
16 Employee Benefits Cas. 2610, Pens. Plan Guide P 23881e the Blaw Knox Retirement Income Plan, Blaw Knox Pension Plan, Blaw Knox Iam Pension Plan, Blaw Knox Equipment Pension Plan, Blaw Knox Duraloy Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, Blaw Knox Duraloy Hourly Pension Plan and Fiduciaries Dean G. Wilson and Richard A. McIntyre v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., and John Doe(s)
See Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1471 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Abijoe Realty Corporation, Debtor, in Re Abijoe Realty Corporation, Debtor, Aleli Corporation, Creditors
Accord Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1472 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987); Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Homestake Mining Co., 722 F.2d 1407, 1414 (8th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Beavers v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.
See Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 614 F.Supp. 694 (N.D.Ala.1985), aff 'd, 799 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lipscomb v. Transac, Inc.
See Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 614 F.Supp. 694 (N.D.Ala.1985) (“Phillips I”), aff'd, 799 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir.1986) (“Phillips II”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987), (citing Shaw, 463 U.S. at 99-100, 105 , 103 S.Ct. at 2901-02, 2904 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reichelt v. Emhart Corporation
See, e.g., Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 905 F.2d at 947 (employer may freely amend ERISA severance pay plan); Young v. Standard Oil (Indiana), 849 F.2d at 1045 (employer is "free to alter or eliminate severance benefits ... without consideration of the employees' interests"); Sutton v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp., 724 F.2d 406, 410 (4th Cir.1983) (ERISA does not prohibit modification of severance plans because Congress believed the vesting of such benefits would be too costly), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct. 2387 , 81 L.Ed.2d 345 (1984); see also Phillips v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.
See, e.g., Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 905 F.2d at 947 (employer may freely amend ERISA severance pay plan); Young v. Standard Oil (Indiana), 849 F.2d at 1045 (employer is “free to alter or eliminate severance benefits ... without consideration of the employees’ interests”); Sutton v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp., 724 F.2d 406, 410 (4th Cir.1983) (ERISA does not prohibit modification of severance plans because Congress believed the vesting of such benefits would be too costly), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct. 2387 , 81 L.Ed.2d 345 (1984); see also Philli…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kern v. Retirement Plan for Employees of L.B.R., Inc.
See also Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 614 F.Supp. 694, 716 (N.D.Ala.1985), aff'd, 799 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987) {“[I]f a plan provides early retirement benefits, an employee who has satisfied plan requirements as to years of service shall be entitled to receive an actu-arially reduced benefit upon reaching the early retirement age specified in the plan....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See, e.g., Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1470 (11th Cir.1986) (request for damages under fraud claim is at its core an ERISA claim and preempted), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987); Authier v. Ginsberg, 757 F.2d 796, 802 (6th Cir.1985) (Michigan common law cause of action for discharge in violation of public policy preempted by ERISA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 888 , 106 S.Ct. 208 , 88 L.Ed.2d 177 (1985); Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348, 1356 (9th Cir.1984) (breach of contract, promissory estoppel, fraud claims preempted by ERISA), cert. denie…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Weiner v. Blue Cross of Maryland, Inc.
See e.g., Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1469-70 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016 , 107 S.Ct. 1893 , 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987); Powell v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gissendaner Mortgage Co.
v.
Central Bank of the South
v.
Central Bank of the South
No. 86-1393.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (3) · M.D. Pennsylvania (1)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.