green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
“it is difficult to perceive a more critical stage of a trial than the taking of evidence on the defendant's guilt.”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State of Texas v. United States of America
See Soberal-Perez v. Heckler, 717 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1983) ("Language, by itself, does not identify members of a suspect class.”); but see Olagues v. Russoniello, 191 F.2d 1511, 1521 (9th Cir.1986) (distinguishing Soberal-Perez v. Heckler and stating that a non-English speaking classification is facially neutral but is, for all practical purposes, a classification based *271 on race and national origin and therefore suspect), vacated as moot, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Neal v. Wolfenbarger
it is difficult to perceive a more critical stage of a trial than the taking of evidence on the defendant's guilt.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health
mmutability is merely one of several possible indications that a classification is likely to reflect prejudice
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alexander Michael Roy
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Green v. Arn, 809 F.2d 1257, 1265 (6th Cir.) (Boggs, J., dissenting), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 [ 98 L.Ed.2d 17 ] (1987), reinstated on remand, 839 F.2d 300 (6th Cir. 1988) (“If a reversal is mandated whenever counsel (even retained) is absent from the courtroom for any significant period, we make such an escape a sure ticket to a new trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Xiong Xeng Moua v. City of Chico
See Russoniello v. Olagues, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987). 10 .
examined
Cited "see"
Kim Moss v. Gerald Hofbauer
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id. at 899 (rejecting the argument that "an error during trial only requires automatic reversal when a defendant has suffered a total deprivation of counsel"). 89 This Court's decision in Green v. Arn, 809 F.2d 1257 (6th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987), reinstated 839 F.2d 300 (1988), directly supports this conclusion.
cited
Cited "see"
American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A. v. Meese
See Olagues v. Russoniello, 797 F.2d 1511 , 1517 n. 7 (9th Cir.1986), vacated as moot on other grounds, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tan Duc Nguyen
See United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 740 (5th Cir.1967) (recognizing that otherwise lawful activities may be punishable under federal laws against voting intimidation “if they have the proscribed effect and purpose”); see also Olagues v. Russoniello, 797 F.2d 1511, 1522 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc) (recognizing that federal law prohibits the intentional intimidation of persons voting or aiding someone else to vote), vacated as moot by Russoniello v. Olagues, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker v. State
See, e.g„ Green v. Arn, 809 F.2d 1257, 1259-64 (6th Cir.1987), vacated, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987), reinstated, 839 F.2d 300 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 847 , 102 L.Ed.2d 979 (1989) (holding that absence of defense counsel during cross-examination of key government witness by attorney for a co-defendant was presumptively prejudicial). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andre Olden v. United States
See Cronic, 466 U.S. at 659 , 104 S.Ct. 2039 (“The presumption that counsel’s assistance is essential requires us to conclude that a trial is unfair if the accused is denied counsel at a critical stage of his trial.”); see also Green v. Arn, 809 F.2d 1257, 1263 (6th Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987), reinstated on remand, 839 F.2d 300 (6th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wischhusen
See, e.g., Green v. Arn, 809 F.2d 1257, 1261 (6th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 484 U.S. 806 , 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987), reinstated, 839 F.2d 300 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 847 , 102 L.Ed.2d 979 (1989); Spencer v. State, 85 Wis.2d 565 , 271 N.W.2d 25, 29 (1978); Headen v. United States, 373 A.2d 599, 601 (D.C.1977); People v. Rainwater, 207 Ill.App.3d 1096 , 152 Ill.Dec. 945, 948 , 566 N.E.2d 822, 825 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Periera v. Chapman
See also Coos Bay Center v. State of Or., Dep’t. of Human Resources, 803 F.2d 1060, 1062 (9th Cir.1986), vacated on grounds of mootness, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 52 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 17 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oregon Department of Human Resources
v.
Coos Bay Care Center
v.
Coos Bay Care Center
No. 86-1419.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1) · E.D. Michigan (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 481 U. S. 1036.] Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider the suggestion of mootness.