R. D. Ryno Indus., Inc. v. Mazda Distributors (Gulf), Inc., 484 U.S. 818 (1987). · Go Syfert
Search
R. D. Ryno Indus., Inc. v. Mazda Distributors (Gulf), Inc., 484 U.S. 818 (1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the antitrust plaintiff is required to define the relevant product market in terms of goods that are "reasonably interchangeable" with the goods at issue.”
19 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation (laed, 2013-04-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation
E.D. La. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the antitrust plaintiff is required to define the relevant product market in terms of goods that are "reasonably interchangeable" with the goods at issue.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R. D. Ryno Industries, Inc., dba R. D. Ryno Mazda
v.
Mazda Distributors (Gulf), Inc.
No. 86-1806.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
484 U.S. 818
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.