green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
“a motion for mistrial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and should only be granted in cases of absolute necessity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Scott v. State
a motion for mistrial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and should only be granted in cases of absolute necessity.
cited
Cited "see"
Porter v. United States Agency for International Development
See Soliman v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 822 F.2d 320, 323 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); c.f.
cited
Cited "see"
Nancy Drew Suders v. Eric D. Easton, William D. Baker, Eric B. Prendergast, Virginia Smith Elliott, and the Pennsylvania State Police
See Levendos, 860 F.2d at 1229 (citing Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988)).
cited
Cited "see"
Barone v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Cooper v. State, 712 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Craig v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mosley
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, Craig v. Florida, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Dufour v. State, 495 So.2d 154 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1101 , 107 S.Ct. 1332 , 94 L.Ed.2d 183 (1987); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Diaz v. State, 747 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Masson v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Barclay v. Wainwright, 444 So.2d 956 (Fla.1984); Irving v. State, 627 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chinea v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Barclay v. Wainwright, 444 So.2d 956 (Fla.1984); Irving v. State, 627 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Burrell v. State, 626 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Driggers v. State, 622 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Sims v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 864 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Segarra v. Mellerson
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 865 (Fla.1987) ("When counsel refers to a witness or a defendant as being a `liar,' and it is understood from the context that the charge is made with reference to testimony given by the person thus characterized, the prosecutor is merely submitting to the jury a conclusion that he is arguing can be drawn from the evidence."), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); see also Forman v. Wallshein, 671 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramsaran v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Witherspoon v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 863 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Williams v. State, 117 So.2d 473, 475 (Fla.1960); Dixon v. State, 627 So.2d 1337, 1338 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patterson v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 864 (Fla.1987) (in prosecution for capital murder, trial court should have sustained defendant’s objection to “testimony about illegal drug use”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Demps v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fotopoulos v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Bundy v. State, 455 So.2d at 345 ; Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 303 , 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Harrison v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Dolence v. U.S. National Bank
See Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230 (3d Cir.1987) (plaintiff’s own testimony sufficient) ce rt. denied 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Delgado v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 863-64 (Fla. 1987), cert. den., 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Baxter v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS
See Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Chipollini, 814 F.2d at 897 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth LEVENDOS, Appellant, v. STERN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and Stern Entertainment System, Inc.
(2×)
See Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., 814 F.2d 893, 896 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 26 , 97 L.Ed.2d 815 (1987); Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Harmon v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 864 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Redish v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 865 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988), wherein the Florida Supreme Court observed: When counsel refers to a witness or a defendant as being a "liar," and it is understood from the context that the charge is made with reference to testimony given by the person thus characterized, the prosecutor is merely submitting to the jury a conclusion that he is arguing can be drawn from the evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 864 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Grossman v. State
See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell v. State
See, e.g., Craig v. State , 510 So.2d 857 , 868 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988) (this aggravating circumstance was not established because 'the murders were carried out quickly by shooting')." Norris v. State , 793 So.2d at 862 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell v. State
See, e.g., Craig v. State , 510 So.2d 857 , 868 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988) (this aggravating circumstance was not established because 'the murders were carried out quickly by shooting')." Norris v. State , 793 So.2d at 862 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fant v. State
See, e.g., Hatcher v. State, 834 So.2d 314 , 318 n. 4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (explaining that the “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine ... ‘forbids the use of evidence in court if it is the product or fruit of a search or seizure ... earned out in violation of constitutional rights.’”) (quoting Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 862 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norris v. State
See, e.g., Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 868 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988) (this aggravating circumstance was not established because "the murders were carried out quickly by shooting").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. Calhoun
See Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa, 896 F.2d 1228, 1231 (10th Cir.1990); see, e.g., Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230, 237 (3d Cir.1987) (inclusion of conclusory reference to issue on final page of appellate brief without further elaboration insufficient to put issue before court of appeals), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Jungels v. Pierce, 825 F.2d 1127, 1130 (7th Cir.1987) (issue mentioned but not developed with supporting argument waived). 16 Plaintiff has failed to preserve, present, and establish any reversible error in the proceeding…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. Calhoun
See Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa, 896 F.2d 1228, 1231 (10th Cir.1990); see, e.g., Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230, 237 (3d Cir.1987) (inclusion of conclusory reference to issue on final page of appellate brief without further elaboration insufficient to put issue before court of appeals), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988); Jungels v. Pierce, 825 F.2d 1127, 1130 (7th Cir.1987) (issue mentioned but not developed with supporting argument waived).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winston v. Children And Youth Services Of Delaware County
As we stated in Wisniewski v. Johns-Mansville Corp., 812 F.2d 81 , 88 (3d Cir.1987), "[a]n issue that is not addressed in an appellant's brief is deemed waived on appeal." See Peter v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 910 F.2d 1179, 1181 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 783 , 112 L.Ed.2d 846 (1991), (collecting cases); see also Jackson v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230 , 237 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988). 21 The situation is no different when the issue waived is abstention.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winston ex rel. Winston v. Children & Youth Services of Delaware County
As we stated in Wisniewski v. Johns-Mansville Corp., 812 F.2d 81 , 88 (3d Cir.1987), “[a]n issue that is not addressed in an appellant’s brief is deemed waived on appeal.” See Peter v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 910 F.2d 1179, 1181 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 783 , 112 L.Ed.2d 846 (1991), (collecting cases); see also Jackson v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230 , 237 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. State
See also Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adeline M. Bruno v. W.B. Saunders Company and Cbs Educational and Professional Publishing, a Division of Cbs, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh, 826 F.2d 230, 233 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 732 , 98 L.Ed.2d 680 (1988) (title VII race discrimination case) (where plaintiff is within protected class, one element of prima facie case made out simply by showing that persons treated more favorably were not within the protected class).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dong
v.
Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University
v.
Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University
No. 87-702.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1988.
Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Cer[*1020] tiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.