green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wang
Id. at 1021. 17 The facts of the Santa Fe case are similar to those in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
J.F. Feeser, Inc., v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 887 (9th Cir.1982) ("the Supreme Court has recognized that the price discrimination that results where buyers seek competitive advantage from sellers encourages the aims of the Sherman Act, a respect in which the Sherman Act is inconsistent with the aims of the Robinson-Patman Act ... while appellants point to injury to their particular business, they do not make the necessary showing of a substantially adverse effect on competition in the record market in general" to sustain a Sherman Act claim). 91 In Tunis Brothers Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. American Legal Distributors, Inc.
Accord Securities and Exchange Commission v. Certain Unknown Purchasers of Common Stock etc., 817 F.2d 1018 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, Olaques v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 484 U.S. 1060 , 108 S.Ct. 1013 , 98 L.Ed.2d 979 (1988); Summers v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 592 F.Supp. 1240 (W.D.Okla.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bussie v. Allmerica Financial Corp.
See M &’R Report at 38; see also SEC v. Certain Unknown Purchasers, 8- 17 F.2d 1018 , 1020-21 (2d Cir.1987) (affirming approval of securities Class action settlement which provided individual compensation only to Class members with out-of-pocket losses), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1060 , *76 108 S.Ct. 1013 , 98 L.Ed.2d 979 (1988); Cohen v. RTC, 61 F.3d 725, 728 (9th Cir. 1995) (provision of different benefits to different Class members permissible where settlement terms are “rationally-based on legitimate considerations”) (citation omitted), vacated on other grounds, 72 F.3d 686 (9th Cir.199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
See, e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Certain Unknown Purchasers, 817 F.2d 1018,1020-21 (2d Cir.l987)(affirming approval of securities class action settlement which provided individual compensation only to class members with out-of-pocket losses), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1060 , 108 S.Ct. 1013 , 98 L.Ed.2d 979 (1988); Spitz v. Connecticut Gen.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Indiana Hospital
See Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 , 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); see also Tunis Brothers Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 823 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1013 , 98 L.Ed.2d 979 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Indiana Hospital
See Matsushita Electric In dustrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 , 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); see also Tunis Brothers Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 823 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1013 , 98 L.Ed.2d 979 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pollak
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-780.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1988.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.