Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Comm'n of West Hartford, 485 U.S. 995 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Comm'n of West Hartford, 485 U.S. 995 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
292 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Sporting Products, Inc. v. Johnny Stewart Game Calls, Inc. (texapp, 1993-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States Sporting Products, Inc. v. Johnny Stewart Game Calls, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see"
Tex. App. · 1993 · confidence medium
Id. at 822.
cited Cited as authority (rule) A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Guste
W.D. Tex. · 1989 · confidence medium
Id. at 808-09. 13 .
cited Cited "see" Robert Robinson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Tex. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Inc. 729 S.W.2d 768, 856-58 (Tex.App. 1987, writ denied), cert, dism'd, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 LEd.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Umbrella Bank, FSB v. Jamison (2×)
W.D. Tex. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See 729 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dism'd, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). 10 .
discussed Cited "see" Erskine v. Baker (2×)
Tex. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref d n.r.e.), cert, dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Sanchez v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (not error to refuse hearing on motion to disqualify a retired judge’s certification to sit as a judge at all, which may only be challenged in a quo warranto proceeding).
discussed Cited "see" Holiday Inns, Inc. v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 842 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). 3 .
discussed Cited "see" Simons v. City of Austin (2×)
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 791 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988); Rego Co. v. Brannon, 682 S.W.2d 677, 680 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).
discussed Cited "see" Dawson-Austin v. Austin (2×)
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988); Charter Builders v. Durham, 683 S.W.2d 487, 489 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).
discussed Cited "see" Herzing v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 837 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. dism’d., 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Gregg County Appraisal District v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 837 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert0 dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Reynolds v. Warthan (2×)
Tex. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 837 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Dudley v. Humana Hospital Corp. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Inc., 729 S.W.2d 768, 837 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Bard v. Charles R. Myers Insurance Agency, Inc. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 865 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1987), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (where the Court of Appeals refused to set aside or order a remittitur “because of the adverse economic impact it would have”).
discussed Cited "see" C.T.W. v. B.C.G. & D.T.G. ex rel. S.G. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810-811 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist] 1987, writ ref'd, n.r.e.) cert denied 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Ctw v. Bcg (2×)
Tex. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810-811 (Tex.App—Houston [1st Dist] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e .) cert denied 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Minnick v. State Bar of Texas (2×)
Tex. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Inc. 729 S.W.2d 768, 856-58 (Tex.App.1987, writ denied), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Harris (2×)
Wash. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Lowenfield , at 187; see Lowenfield v. Butler, 485 U.S. 995 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 , 108 S.Ct. 1456 (1988) (denying motion for stay pending certiorari).
discussed Cited "see" INA of Texas/now CIGNA Insurance Co. of Texas v. Adams (2×)
Tex. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810-811 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
cited Cited "see" Martin v. Dugger
S.D. Fla. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lowenfield v. Butler, — U.S. -, -, 108 S.Ct. 1456, 1457 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of stay).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Henson (4×)
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Pate v. Texline Feed Mills, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 238, 245 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (holding that by not objecting, the appellants had waived any error in the trial court’s correction of typographical errors in the charge); see also Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 833-34 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (holding that the failure to object to a trial court’s instruction constitutes waiver). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Banks (2×)
Pa. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
In so holding, however, the Court explicitly “le[ft] to the State[s] the task of developing appropriate ways to enforce th[at] constitutional restriction.” Ford, 477 U.S. at 416 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 ; see also Lowenfield v. Butler, 485 U.S. 995, 996 , 108 S.Ct. 1456 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (Brennan, J., dissenting) (noting that, in Ford , “[a] majority of this Court did not agree on the precise procedures that the Constitution requires when the question is raised of a prisoner’s sanity for execution”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Texaco v. Pennzoil, 729 S.W.2d 768, 802-03 (Tex.App.1987), cert, dismissed 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. OXY USA Inc. (2×)
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App.1987), ce rt. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) ($1 billion tortious interference); Central Tele.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. Oxy Usa Inc. (2×)
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App.1987), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) ($1 billion tortious interference); Central Tele.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Porter v. Vick (2×)
Tex. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Tex.R.Civ.P. 18; see also Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 846-47 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ refd n.r.e.), cert, dism’d, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Newport Ltd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2×)
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Trinity Carton Co. v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 767 F.2d 184, 190 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1017 , 106 S.Ct. 1202 , 89 L.Ed.2d 315 (1986); see also Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 788 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (New York law), writ ref'd n.r.e., cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." D/FW Commercial Roofing Co., Inc. v. Mehra (2×)
Tex. App. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Custom Design & Bldg. v. Clawson, 794 S.W.2d 38, 41 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no writ); see also Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768, 810 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Duross v. Freeman (2×)
Tex. App. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 994 , 108 S.Ct. 1305 , 99 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Udolf
v.
Plan and Zoning Commission of the Town of West Hartford
No. 87-1285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 11, 1988.
485 U.S. 995
Cited by 125 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from Super. Ct. Conn., Hartford/New Britain Jud. Dist., dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.