Advert. Co. v. Bradshaw, 273 S.E.2d 446 (N.C. 1980). · Go Syfert
Advert. Co. v. Bradshaw, 273 S.E.2d 446 (N.C. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus Curiae (ca4, 1991-10-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus Curiae
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare National Advertising Co. v. Bradshaw, 48 N.C.App. 10 , 268 S.E.2d 816 , appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 400 , 273 S.E.2d 446 (1980) (holding illegal National’s reconstruction of sign deemed nonconforming under state statute and located along federal highway system where sign was more than 50 percent destroyed by wind). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ADVERTISING CO.
v.
BRADSHAW, SEC. OF TRANSPORTATION
No. 12 PC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 4, 1980.
273 S.E.2d 446
Published

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 November 1980.