State v. Battle, 307 S.E.2d 367 (N.C. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Battle, 307 S.E.2d 367 (N.C. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is significant that the rule provides a 'reasonable opportunity' rather than requiring that the presentation of materials be in accordance with rule 56.”
18 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Knotts-Thomas v. City of Sanford (ncctapp, 2001-02-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Knotts-Thomas v. City of Sanford
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is significant that the rule provides a 'reasonable opportunity' rather than requiring that the presentation of materials be in accordance with rule 56.
discussed Cited "see" J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Porter v. Matthews Enterprises, Inc., 63 N.C.App. 140, 143 , 303 S.E.2d 828, 830 , disc. rev. denied, 309 N.C. 462 , 307 S.E.2d 365 (1983) (stating Green held avoiding separate trials on separate issues is not substantial right); see also Survey of Developments in North Carolina Law—Civil Procedure, 61 N.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
BATTLE
No. 185P83.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 27, 1983.
307 S.E.2d 367
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 September 1983.