green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
“where there is evidence of active . . . appreciation of the marital assets after , the court must consider such appreciation as a factor under g.s. 50-20(c)(11a) or (12), respectively”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smith v. Smith
(2×)
where there is evidence of active . . . appreciation of the marital assets after , the court must consider such appreciation as a factor under g.s. 50-20(c)(11a) or (12), respectively
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. Singer Co.
See, e.g., McGaha v. Nancy's Styling Salon, 90 N.C.App. 214 , 368 S.E.2d 49 , disc. rev. denied, 323 N.C. 174 , 373 S.E.2d 110 (1988); Umstead v. Employment Security Commission, 75 N.C.App. 538 , 331 S.E.2d 218 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 675 , 336 S.E.2d 405 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MISHLER
v.
MISHLER
v.
MISHLER
No. 225P88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 7, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 September 1988.