Mishler v. Mishler, 373 S.E.2d 111 (N.C. 1988). · Go Syfert
Mishler v. Mishler, 373 S.E.2d 111 (N.C. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where there is evidence of active . . . appreciation of the marital assets after , the court must consider such appreciation as a factor under g.s. 50-20(c)(11a) or (12), respectively”
30 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. Smith (ncctapp, 1993-08-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Smith v. Smith (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1993 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
where there is evidence of active . . . appreciation of the marital assets after , the court must consider such appreciation as a factor under g.s. 50-20(c)(11a) or (12), respectively
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barnes v. Singer Co.
N.C. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McGaha v. Nancy's Styling Salon, 90 N.C.App. 214 , 368 S.E.2d 49 , disc. rev. denied, 323 N.C. 174 , 373 S.E.2d 110 (1988); Umstead v. Employment Security Commission, 75 N.C.App. 538 , 331 S.E.2d 218 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 675 , 336 S.E.2d 405 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MISHLER
v.
MISHLER
No. 225P88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 7, 1988.
373 S.E.2d 111

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 September 1988.