green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
(2×)
But see Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259 , 382 S.E.2d 759 , reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989) (stating that no reason exists to distinguish between fleet and nonfleet policies under interpolicy stacking).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
HOLLAR BY AND THROUGH HOLLAR v. Hawkins
Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259 , 382 S.E.2d 759 (1989), reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 *797 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weaver v. O'NEAL
(2×)
See Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259, 265 , 382 S.E.2d 759, 763 , reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Pennington
(2×)
See Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co, 325 N.C. 259, 265 , 382 S.E.2d 759, 763 , reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Smith
(2×)
See Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259 , 382 S.E.2d 759 , rehearing denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
(2×)
See Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259 , 382 S.E.2d 759 , reh'g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Fields
(2×)
See Sutton v. Aetna, 325 N.C. 259 , 382 S.E.2d 759 , reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989); See also Crowder v. N.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Silverman Ex Rel. Radja
(2×)
See Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259 , 382 S.E.2d 759 , reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of Pine Knoll Shores v. Evans
(4×)
See, e.g., Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259, 268 , 382 S.E.2d 759, 765 , reh'g denied, 325 N.C. 437 , 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989); Schofield v. Tea Co., 299 N.C. 582, 590 , 264 S.E.2d 56, 62 (1980); Childers v. Parker's Inc., 274 N.C. 256, 260 , 162 S.E.2d 481, 483-84 (1968); In re Watson, 273 N.C. 629, 634 , 161 S.E.2d 1, 6-7 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sherry S. SUTTON
v.
The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY.
v.
The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY.
539PA88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 5, 1989.
Published
Yow, Yow, Culbreth, Fox & Pennington, Wilmington, for plaintiff.
Marshall, Williams, Gorham & Brawley, Wilmington, for defendant.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C.Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 1989."