Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 463 S.E.2d 237 (N.C. 1995). · Go Syfert
Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 463 S.E.2d 237 (N.C. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matter of Estate of Crabtree (iowa, 1996-06-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Estate of Crabtree
Iowa · 1996 · signal: accord · confidence high
“The established rule is that a power of attorney must be strictly construed and the instrument will be held to grant only those powers which are specified.” Bloom v. Weiser, 348 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1977); accord Whitford v. Gaskill, 119 N.C.App. 790 , 460 S.E.2d 346, 348 (1995), cert. granted, 342 N.C. 197 , 463 S.E.2d 250 (1995); see Abodeely v. Cavras, 221 N.W.2d 494, 501-02 (Iowa 1974) (construing power of attorney as granting only powers specified therein).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dallas L. ISENHOUR, and wife, Sandra K. Isenhour
v.
UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, and Universal Underwriters Group.
47PA94.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 2, 1995.
463 S.E.2d 237
Published

David J. Irvine, Jr., Windsor, for Isenhour.

Kent L. Hamrick, James H. Kelly, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Insurance Company.

Prior report: 341 N.C. 597, 461 S.E.2d 317.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C.Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of November 1995."