Matter of Huff, 547 S.E.2d 9 (N.C. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Huff, 547 S.E.2d 9 (N.C. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 · …because a termination of parental rights proceeding is civil in nature, it is governed by the rules of civil procedure unless otherwise provided ⚠ not in text
267 citation events (267 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re A.B.D. (ncctapp, 2005-09-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re A.B.D.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because a termination of parental rights proceeding is civil in nature, it is governed by the rules of civil procedure unless otherwise provided
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re ABD
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because a termination of parental rights proceeding is civil in nature, it is governed by the rules of civil procedure unless otherwise provided
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re McKinney
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because a termination of parental rights proceeding is civil in nature, it is governed by the rules of civil procedure unless otherwise provided
cited Cited as authority (rule) In re K.J.L.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Kjl
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
"The standard of appellate review is whether the trial court's findings of fact are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law." In re D.J.D., D.M.D., S.J.D., J.M.D., 171 N.C.App. 230, 238 , 615 S.E.2d 26, 32 (2005) (citing In re Huff, 140 N.C.App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In re M.D., N.D.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re MD
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
"The standard of appellate review is whether the trial court's findings of fact are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law." In re D.J.D., D.M.D., S.J.D., J.M.D., 171 N.C.App. 230, 238 , 615 S.E.2d 26, 32 (2005) (citing In re Huff, 140 N.C.App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In the Matter of Bgr
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re KJL
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
"The standard of appellate review is whether the trial court's findings of fact are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law." In re D.J.D., D.M.D., S.J.D., J.M.D., 171 N.C.App. 230, 238 , 615 S.E.2d 26, 32 (2005) ( citing In re Huff, 140 N.C.App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)). *280 A "neglected juvenile" is defined in N.C.
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Dh
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)). 1.
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re DJD
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
In re Huff, 140 N.C.App. 288, 291 , 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374 , 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of X. HUFF.
532P00.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 1, 2001.
547 S.E.2d 9
Cited by 124 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 89%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (3)

Alton D. Bain, Lillington, for Tampatha Huff.

Richard E. Jester, Angier, for James J. Huff.

E. Marshall Woodall, Lillington, for Harnett County DSS.

Prior report: 140 N.C.App. 288, 536 S.E.2d 838.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Respondent (James J. Huff) in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

[*10] "Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of February 2001."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (James J. Huff) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of February 2001."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.