green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re CM
N.C.G.S. § 7B-1001(a) (2005); see In re Laney, 156 N.C.App. 639, 643 , 577 S.E.2d 377, 379 (construing a prior version of Section 7B-1001, the Laney Court held that a party was not entitled to appeal an adjudication and temporary dispositional order in that it was not a final order), disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 762 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re C.M.
N.C.G.S. § 7B-1001(a) (2005); see In re Laney, 156 N.C.App. 639 , 643, 577 S.E.2d 377 , 379 (construing a prior version of Section 7B-1001, the Laney Court held that a party was not entitled to appeal an adjudication and temporary dispositional order in that it was not a final order), disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 762 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re JMW
See In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513, 518 , 579 S.E.2d 496, 499 , disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003) (requiring the appointment of a guardian ad litem where the allegations tend to show incapacity "because of mental illness"); In re T.W., 173 N.C.App. 153, 159-60 , 617 S.E.2d 702, 705-06 (2005) (noting that the trial court's duty to appoint a guardian ad litem was triggered when the respondent's "mental instability and her incapacity to raise her minor children were central factors in the court's decision"); In re J.D., 164 N.C.App. 176, 182 , 605 S.E.2d 643, 646 (in a negl…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re J.M.W.
See In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513 , 518, 579 S.E.2d 496 , 499, disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003) (requiring the appointment of a guardian ad litem where the allegations tend to show incapacity "because of mental illness"); In re T.W., 173 N.C.App. 153 , 159-60, 617 S.E.2d 702 , 705-06 (2005) (noting that the trial court's duty to appoint a guardian ad litem was triggered when the respondent's "mental instability and her incapacity to raise her minor children were central factors in the court's decision"); In re J.D., 164 N.C.App. 176 , 182, 605 S.E.2d 643 , 646 (in a ne…
discussed
Cited "see"
Formyduval v. Britt
See Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A., 157 N.C.App. 60 , 66, 577 S.E.2d 918 , 923 (2003) (a legal malpractice plaintiff must prove success of the underlying action even if the attorney's "negligent actions ... resulted in a total foreclosure of the underlying case being heard on its merits"), disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 758 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re KRS
See In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513, 517-18 , 579 S.E.2d 496, 499 (citing In re Richard v. Michna, 110 N.C.App. 817, 821-22 , 431 S.E.2d 485, 488 (1993)), disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re K.R.S.
See In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513 , 517-18, 579 S.E.2d 496 , 499 (citing In re Richard v. Michna, 110 N.C.App. 817 , 821-22, 431 S.E.2d 485 , 488 (1993)), disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re HW
See In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513, 518 , 579 S.E.2d 496, 499 , disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003) (interpreting an analogous provision for the appointment of a guardian ad litem at a termination of parental rights proceeding).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re SB
Gen.Stat. § 7B-1101(1)); see also In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513, 515 , 579 S.E.2d 496, 498 , disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re SB
Gen.Stat. § 7B-1101(1)); see also In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513, 515 , 579 S.E.2d 496, 498 , disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re ENS
See also In re Estes, 157 N.C.App. 513 , 579 S.E.2d 496 , disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 459 , 585 S.E.2d 390 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Butts
No. 296A03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 1, 2003.
357 N.C. 459
Published
1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA02-531)
2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas
3. AG’s NOA Based Upon a Dissent
4. AG’s PDR as to Additional Issues
5. Respondent’s (Travis Ray Butts) Motion to Dismiss State’s PDR
6. Respondent’s (Travis Ray Butts) Motion to Amend the Record on Appeal
1. Allowed 06/06/03
2. Allowed
3.-
4. Allowed
5. Denied
6. Allowed