green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re M.K. (I)
See In re M.R.D.C., 166 N.C.App. 693 , 697, 603 S.E.2d 890 , 893 (2004), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 321 , 611 S.E.2d 413 (2005) ("[I]f a finding of fact is essentially a conclusion of law it will be treated as a conclusion of law which is reviewable on appeal." (citations, internal quotation marks, ellipses, and brackets omitted)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eddings
v.
Southern Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Assocs., P. A.
v.
Southern Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Assocs., P. A.
No. 059P05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 1, 2005.
359 N.C. 321
Published
1. Pit’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA03-1298)
2. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
1. Dismissed ex mero motu (03/03/05)
2. Denied (03/03/05)