green
Positive treatment
Trending · 56 recent citers
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re JNS
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311, 315 , 598 S.E.2d 387, 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004). *916 In re L.E.B., K.T.B., 169 N.C.App. 375, 378-79 , 610 S.E.2d 424, 426 , disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 632 , 616 S.E.2d 538 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re J.N.S.
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311 , 315, 598 S.E.2d 387 , 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004). *916 In re L.E.B., K.T.B., 169 N.C.App. 375 , 378-79, 610 S.E.2d 424 , 426, disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 632 , 616 S.E.2d 538 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DMM
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311, 315 , 598 S.E.2d 387, 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re D.M.M.
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311 , 315, 598 S.E.2d 387 , 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re D.S.
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311 , 315, 598 S.E.2d 387 , 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DS
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311, 315 , 598 S.E.2d 387, 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re O.S.W.
(2×)
This Court has held that where the thirty-day time requirement for entry of an order terminating parental rights has not been met, "prejudice must be shown before the late entry will be deemed reversible error." In re C.J.B., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 614 S.E.2d 368 , 369 (2005); see In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311 , 316, 598 S.E.2d 387 , 391, disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004). "[T]he need to show prejudice in order to warrant reversal is highest the fewer number of days the delay exists. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re OSW
(2×)
This Court has held that where the thirty-day time requirement for entry of an order terminating parental rights has not been met, "prejudice must be shown before the late entry will be deemed reversible error." In re C.J.B., 171 N.C.App. 132 , ___, 614 S.E.2d 368, 369 (2005); see In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311, 316 , 598 S.E.2d 387, 391 , disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004). "[T]he need to show prejudice in order to warrant reversal is highest the fewer number of days the delay exists....
discussed
Cited "see"
In re L.L.
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311 , 316, 598 S.E.2d 387 , 391 (no prejudice shown by respondent parent from the entry of an order terminating parental rights 59 days late), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004); In re E.N.S., 164 N.C.App. 146 , 153, 595 S.E.2d 167 , 171 (holding that a court's failure to enter adjudication and disposition orders in accordance with N.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re LL
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311, 316 , 598 S.E.2d 387, 391 (no prejudice shown by respondent parent from the entry of an order terminating parental rights 59 days late), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004); In re E.N.S., 164 N.C.App. 146, 153 , 595 S.E.2d 167, 171 (holding that a court's failure to enter adjudication and disposition orders in accordance with N.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re CLC
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311, 315 , 598 S.E.2d 387, 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re C.L.C.
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C.App. 311 , 315, 598 S.E.2d 387 , 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re LEB
(2×)
See In re J.L.K., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 598 S.E.2d 387, 390 (2004) (order entered eighty-nine days after the hearing), disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 68 , 604 S.E.2d 314 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re J.L.K., a minor juvenile.
402P04.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 6, 2004.
Cited by 54 opinions | Published
Richard E. Jester, for J.L.K.
Martin Tetreault, Smithfield, for S.B.
James D. Johnson, Jr., Benson, for Guardian ad Litem.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of August 2004 by Respondent (G.K.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."