Spruce Pine Indus. Park, Inc. v. Explosives Supply Co., 361 N.C. 222 (N.C. 2007). · Go Syfert
Spruce Pine Indus. Park, Inc. v. Explosives Supply Co., 361 N.C. 222 (N.C. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Cook (ncctapp, 2007-07-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cook
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Payne, 327 N.C. 194, 202 , 394 S.E.2d 158, 162 (1990) ("[T]he purpose of discovery under our statutes is to protect the defendant from unfair surprise by the introduction of evidence he cannot anticipate."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1092 , 111 S.Ct. 977 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1062 (1991). ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 635 S.E.2d 520, 526-27 (2006) disc. rev. denied, 361 N.C. 222 , 642 S.E.2d 709 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Freeman
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Chivers, ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 636 S.E.2d 590, 593 (2006) ("Our Supreme Court has held that an error at sentencing is not considered an error at trial for the purpose of Appellate Rule 10(b)(1)."), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 222 , 642 S.E.2d 709 (2007); State v. Curmon, 171 N.C.App. 697, 704 , 615 S.E.2d 417, 422-23 (2005) ("[D]efendant was not required to object at sentencing to preserve this issue for appellate review."); State v. Hargett, 157 N.C.App. 90, 92 , 577 S.E.2d 703, 705 (2003) ("Our Supreme Court has held that an error at sentencing is not considered an err…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spruce Pine Indus. Park, Inc.
v.
Explosives Supply Co.
No. 550P06.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 1, 2007.
361 N.C. 222
Published

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-701)

Denied 01/25/07