neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1927 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1927
1976
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul Westphal, a Corporation, Respondent,
v.
Westphal’s World’s Best Corporation Et Al., Appellants
v.
Westphal’s World’s Best Corporation Et Al., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 16, 1926.
Martin Conboy and William Huck, Jr., for appellants.
William H. Hamilton and Norman C. Conklin for respondent.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
Lead Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ.; HISCOCK, Ch. J., ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ., dissent and vote for modification of judgment as to individual defendant Paul Westphal.
Lead Opinion
no opinion.
Concurrence
Concur: Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.; Hiscock, Ch. J., Andrews and Lehman, JJ., dissent and vote for modification of judgment as to individual defendant Paul Westphal.