Timberline Elec. Supply Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North Am., 417 N.E.2d 1248 (NY 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Timberline Elec. Supply Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North Am., 417 N.E.2d 1248 (NY 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“any right timberline has under the suretyship agreement arises because of timberline's status as a third-party beneficiary. as such timberline is bound by the conditions and limitations created by the contract.”
40 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Maddison v. Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), Inc. (nynd, 2020-02-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Maddison v. Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), Inc.
N.D.N.Y. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
any right timberline has under the suretyship agreement arises because of timberline's status as a third-party beneficiary. as such timberline is bound by the conditions and limitations created by the contract.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Timberline Electric Supply Corp.
v.
Insurance Company of North America
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 22, 1980.
417 N.E.2d 1248
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Thomas L. Jones and William J. Kirk for appellant., Robert A. Small for respondent.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: N.D. New York (1)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (72 AD2d 905).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.