green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
16.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 ·
…retroactive alteration of the law is strongly contraindicated when the subject is settled rules of property
at p. 551
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Levy v. Crawford
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
retroactive alteration of the law is strongly contraindicated when the subject is settled rules of property
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maynard Realty Corp. v. Testa
retroactive alteration of the law is strongly contraindicated when the subject is settled rules of property
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lavelle v. Lavelle
Like the defendant in Aloisi , Joseph did not come to an agreement for consideration with his mother to create a tenancy at will, nor did he have an exclusive right to possession prior to receiving the notice to quit The notice to quit issued to Joseph was sufficient. 2 See West, supra at 542 (a fourteen-day notice to quit was “adequate to terminate immediately a gratuitous tenancy.”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Aloisi v. Kelley
(2×)
Kelley’s occupation of the property at that point was, at most, a “gratuitous tenancy.” See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 541-542 (1981) (where no rent was paid or demanded, tenant held “gratuitous tenancy”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pioneer Valley Federal Credit Union v. Soja
It is equally undeniable, however, that the Legislature included in its revision of G.L.c. 209, §1 an express, unambiguous ‘proviso regarding liability of the spouses for necessaries.’ West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 550 (1981).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Conroy
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Licker at 407, 164 N.E. 613 ; West at 536, 419 N.E.2d 262 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mediplex of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Donovan
Bank, 415 Mass. 145, 150 (1993). 8 It is equally undeniable, however, that the Legislature included in its revision of G.L.c. 209, §1 an express, unambiguous “proviso regarding liability of the spouses for necessaries.” West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 550 (1981).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Somerset Savings Bank v. Goldberg
See Coraccio v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, 415 Mass. 145 , 612 N.E.2d 650, 652-653 (1993); West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534 , 419 N.E.2d 262, 263-264 (1981).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Carey's, Inc. v. Carey
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
In addition, prior to February 11,1980, “the husband [was] during their joint lives entitled to the exclusive possession of real estate owned by the husband and wife as tenants by the entirety,” Licker v. Gluskin, 265 Mass. at 406, that is, he had “full control of the property and the returns from it during his lifetime.” West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 543 (1981).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Veterans' Agent v. Rinaldi
Upon John’s death, the defendant became the sole owner of the property “free and clear of any debts ... of [John].” West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 546 (1981).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Turner v. Greenaway
In West , we recognized that “[r]etroactive alteration of the law is strongly contraindicated when the subject is settled rules of property.” West v. First Agricultural Bank, supra at 551.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Paquette v. Koscotas
Accordingly, the principles articulated in Lowell apply to the case at bar. 5 Compare West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 548-552 (1981), a decision dealing with the effect of the E.R.A. on tenancies by the entirety which was expressly made prospective so as not to unsettle vested rights.
cited
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. Director of the Department of Labor & Workforce Development
See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534 , 549-551 & n.26 (1981); Connolly’s Case, 418 Mass. 848, 852 (1994).
examined
Cited "see"
Salem v. Coombs (In Re Coombs)
(4×)
See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534 , 419 N.E.2d 262 (1981); Pineo v. White, 320 Mass. 487 , 70 N.E.2d 294 (1946); Licker v. Gluskin, 265 Mass. 403 , 164 N.E. 613 (1929); Phelps v. Simons, 159 Mass. 415 , 34 N.E. 657 (1893); Pray v. Stebbins, 141 Mass. 219 , 4 N.E. 824 (1886).
cited
Cited "see"
Feldman v. Feldman
See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 544-552 (1981), and authorities there cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Abdallah
(2×)
See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 536 , 419 N.E.2d 262 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Regnante v. Baldassare
See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 543-552 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
DeVaux v. American Home Assurance Co.
See West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 540-541 (1981); Corrigan v. O’Brien, 353 Mass. 341 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shwachman v. Meagher
Friedman v. Harold, 638 F.2d 262, 265-66 (1981); see also West v. First Agricultural Bank, 382 Mass. 534, 552 (1981) (discussing constitutionality of tenancy by the entirety and holding that any decision would impact tenancies created after the decision).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RUBY W. WEST vs. FIRST AGRICULTURAL BANK.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Feb 12, 1981.
Cited by 23 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, KAPLAN, WILKINS, LIACOS, & ABRAMS, JJ.