Lucchese v. Rotella, 457 N.E.2d 796 (NY 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Lucchese v. Rotella, 457 N.E.2d 796 (NY 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Fay v. South Colonie Central School District (ca2, 1986-09-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fay v. South Colonie Central School District (2×)
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lucchese v. Rotella, 97 A.D.2d 645 , 468 N.Y.S.2d 948, 950 (3rd Dep't), aff'd, 60 N.Y.2d 815 , 469 N.Y.S.2d 690 , 457 N.E.2d 796 (Ct.App.1983); Willsey v. Strawway, 44 Misc.2d 601 , 255 N.Y.S.2d 224, 230 (Sup.Ct.1963), aff'd mem., 22 A.D.2d 973 , 254 N.Y.S.2d 830 (3rd Dep't 1964) 2 We cite Pullman only in connection with the broad proposition above quoted.
discussed Cited "see" Fay v. South Colonie Central School District (2×)
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lucchese v. Botella, 97 A.D.2d 645 , 468 N.Y.S.2d 948, 950 (3rd Dep’t), aff'd, 60 N.Y.2d 815 , 469 N.Y.S.2d 690 , 457 N.E.2d 796 (Ct.App. 1983); Willsey v. Strawway, 44 Misc.2d 601 , 255 N.Y.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Bernard C. Lucchese
v.
Philip J. Rotella, and Helena M. Donohue
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 28, 1983.
457 N.E.2d 796
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Charles Apotheker, appellant pro se, and for Phillip J. Rotella and others, appellants., Robert J. Miller, Arthur Moskoff and Jerry A. Weiss for O. Fred Miller and another, appellants., Thomas J. Spargo for Bernard C. Lucchese and others, respondents., lian S. Schoenberger, County Attorney (Martin Hurwitz of counsel), for Rockland County Board of Elections, respondent., Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (William J. Kogan and Peter J. Dooley of counsel), respondent pro se.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for those reasons set forth in the memorandum of the Appellate Division which relate to the failure to abide by the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 6-108 of the Election Law.

While we do not address the appropriateness or propriety of instituting this proceeding in Albany County rather than in Rockland County where the controversy arose, we do not condone the practice.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.