green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Tynan v. Gen. Motors Corp., 591 A.2d 1024 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BENJAMIN OREMLAND, PEARL OREMLAND, DAVID LEWIS AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DUNN'S ENGLISH LEATHER SHOP, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND LOUIS W. DUNN AND JESSIE R. DUNN, AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v.
BENJAMIN OREMLAND, PEARL OREMLAND, DAVID LEWIS AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DUNN'S ENGLISH LEATHER SHOP, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND LOUIS W. DUNN AND JESSIE R. DUNN, AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 22, 1954.
Published opinion
Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Greene & Hellring, attorneys).
Mr. David M. Perskie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Perskie and Perskie, and Messrs. Brown and Frank, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N.J. Super. 443 (Ch. Div. 1954).
For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 4.
For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices JACOBS and BRENNAN — 3.