State v. Quiroz, 225 P.3d 794 (N.M. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Quiroz, 225 P.3d 794 (N.M. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Titus v. City of Albuquerque (nmctapp, 2011-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Titus v. City of Albuquerque
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oldham v. Oldham, 2009-NMCA-126, ¶ 5 , 147 N.M. 329 , 222 P.3d 701 ("We review the district court's statutory interpretation and conclusions of law de novo."), cert. granted, 2009-NMCERT-011 , 147 N.M. 464 , 225 P.3d 794 ; Weise v. Washington Tru Solutions, L.L.C., 2008-NMCA-121, ¶ 9 , 144 N.M. 867 , 192 P.3d 1244 ("Whether a state claim is preempted by federal law is a legal question that we review de novo."); ACLU of N.M. v. City of Albuquerque (ACLU I ), 2006-NMCA-078, ¶ 10 , 139 N.M. 761 , 137 P.3d 1215 ("We review constitutional challenges de novo.").
discussed Cited "see" State v. Almeida (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ochoa, 2009-NMCA-002, ¶¶ 36-37 , 146 N.M. 32 , 206 P.3d 143 , cert. quashed, 2009-NMCERT-011 , 147 N.M. 464 , 225 P.3d 794 (traffic stops must be founded by a reasonable suspicion that the suspect has broken the law); State v. Anaya, 2008-NMCA-020, ¶ 7 , 143 N.M. 431 , 176 P.3d 1163 (holding that the officer's mistaken belief that a traffic offense had occurred did not create the necessary reasonable suspicion for a valid traffic stop). {¶ 9} The New Mexico Motor Vehicle Code, Section 66-7-322(A), (B), and (D), "Required position and method of turning at intersections" provide…
discussed Cited "see" Titus v. City of Albuquerque (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oldham v. Oldham, 2009-NMCA-126, ¶ 5 , 147 N.M. 329 , 222 P.3d 701 (“We review the district court’s statutory interpretation and conclusions of law de novo.”), cert. 3 granted, 2009-NMCERT-011 , 147 N.M. 464 , 225 P.3d 794 ; Weise v. Washington Tru Solutions, L.L.C., 2008-NMCA-121, ¶ 9 , 144 N.M. 867 , 192 P.3d 1244 (“Whether a state claim is preempted by federal law is a legal question that we review de novo.”); ACLU of N.M. v. City of Albuquerque (ACLU I), 2006-NMCA-078, ¶ 10 , 139 N.M. 761 , 137 P.3d 1215 (“We review constitutional challenges de novo.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
QUIROZ.
32,030 (COA 29,428).
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Nov 25, 2009.
225 P.3d 794
Published

Denial of Certiorari.