In Interest of RH, 441 N.W.2d 233 (Wis. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
In Interest of RH, 441 N.W.2d 233 (Wis. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Michael S. (wis, 2005-06-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Under fire — who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this case. This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Concurrence Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman (2017)
“In Interest of R.H., 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989) (on petition for review). 62.”
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" State v. Michael S. (4×)
Wis. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re R.H., 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989). [18] B.J.N., 162 Wis. 2d at 645 . [19] S.D.R., 109 Wis. 2d at 576 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. APRIL O. (2×)
Wis. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See T.H. v. La Crosse County, 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 35-38, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989). 4 In this case, both the initial hearing and dispositional hearings were held beyond the mandatory time limits established in Wis. Stats. §§ 48.422 and 48.424(4), respectively.
discussed Cited "see" Waukesha County v. DARLENE R. (2×)
Wis. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See T.H. *640 v. La Crosse County, 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 35-38, 433 N.W.2d 16 , 22-23 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" In Interest of Jermaine Tj (2×)
Wis. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re R.H. 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 33, 433 N.W.2d 16 , 21 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" Green County Department of Human Services v. H.N. (2×)
Wis. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See In Interest of R.H., 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" In Interest of BJN (2×)
Wis. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See In Interest of R.H., 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. KYWANDA F. (2×)
Wis. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., T.H. v. LaCrosse County [In Interest of R.H.], 147 Wis. 2d 22 , 27-31, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Interest of Shawn BN (2×)
Wis. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re R.H., 147 Wis. 2d 22, 25 , 433 N.W.2d 16, 18 (Ct. App. *375 1988), aff'd, 150 Wis. 2d 432 , 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989) (per curiam); In re B.J.N., 162 Wis. 2d 635 , 654 n.15, 469 N.W.2d 845 , 852 n.15 (Ct. App. 1991); In re L.M.C., 146 Wis. 2d 377 , 391, 432 N.W.2d 588 , 594 (Ct. App. 1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN the INTEREST OF R.H., III, a person under the age of 18: T.H., Appellant,
v.
LA CROSSE COUNTY, Respondent-Petitioner. IN the INTEREST OF L.H., a person under the age of 18: L.H., Appellant, v. STATE of Wisconsin, Respondent-Petitioner.
88-0372, 88-0605.
Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Jun 23, 1989.
441 N.W.2d 233
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

For the respondents-petitioners, State of Wisconsin and LaCrosse County, the cause was argued by Sally L.[*433] Wellman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Donald J. Hanaway, attorney general.

For the appellant, T.H., there was a brief and oral argument by Glenn L. Cushing, assistant state public defender.

For the appellant, L.H., there was a brief by Eugene R. Thompson, Madison, and oral argument by Daniel Hildebrand, Madison.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, 147 Wis. 2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice NATHAN S. HEFFERNAN, Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHASON, and Justice WILLIAM G. CALLOW being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice DONALD W. STEIMETZ, and Justice LOUIS J. CECI being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Decision affirmed.