State v. Young, 528 N.W.2d 417 (Wis. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Young, 528 N.W.2d 417 (Wis. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cavey v. Walrath, 598 N.W.2d 240 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999)
Under fire: who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this case. This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Concurrence Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman, 2017 WI 22, 892 N.W.2d 734
“State v. Young, 191 Wis. 2d 393 , 528 N.W.2d 417 (1995) (on petition for review). 64.”
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Jay YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
93-0387-CR.
Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Mar 14, 1995.
Published opinion
528 N.W.2d 417
1995 Wisc. LEXIS 30
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

[*394] For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there was a brief by Michael J. Steinle and Law Office of Michael J. Steinle, Milwaukee and oral argument by Michael J. Steinle.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice DAY, Justice STEINMETZ, and Justice WILCOX would affirm; Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice ABRAHAMSON, and Justice BABLITCH would reverse. Justice GESKE withdrew from participation.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

By the Court.—The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.