Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee, 790 N.E.2d 269 (NY 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee, 790 N.E.2d 269 (NY 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (65 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Air Crash Near Clarence Center, New York, on February 12, 2009 (nywd, 2013-11-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" In re Air Crash Near Clarence Center, New York, on February 12, 2009 (3×)
W.D.N.Y. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tron-lone v. Lac d’Amiante Du Quebec, 297 A.D.2d 528, 528 , 747 N.Y.S.2d 79, 80 (N.Y.A.D. 1st Dep’t 2002), aff'd, 99 N.Y.2d 647 , 760 N.Y.S.2d 96 , 790 N.E.2d 269 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Elmaliach v. Bank of China Ltd.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: compare · confidence low
Co., 267 AD2d 81, 82-83 [1st Dept 1999] [choice of law analysis required where the claim of bad faith differed between New York and Virgin Islands law; Virgin Islands law did not require a showing that the egregious conduct was “aimed at the public generally,” in order to seek punitive damages]; compare Tronlone v Lac d’Amiante Du Quebec, 297 AD2d 528 [1st Dept 2002], affd 99 NY2d 647 [2003] [no choice of law analysis required where there was no relevant conflict between New York and New Jersey law with respect to the sufficiency of a plaintiff’s showing of product identification and e…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Elmaliach v. Bank of China Ltd.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: compare · confidence low
Co., 267 AD2d 81, 82-83 [1st Dept 1999] [choice of law analysis required where the claim of bad faith differed between New York and Virgin Islands law; Virgin Islands law did not require a showing that the egregious conduct was “aimed at the public generally,” in order to seek punitive damages]; compare Tronlone v Lac d’Amiante Du Quebec, 297 AD2d 528 [1st Dept 2002], affd 99 NY2d 647 [2003] [no choice of law analysis required where there was no relevant conflict between New York and New Jersey law with respect to the sufficiency of a plaintiff’s showing of product identification and e…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lucy Tronlone, Respondent,
v.
Lac D’Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee, Appellant, Et Al., Defendants
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 8, 2003.
790 N.E.2d 269
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C., New York City (Allan Young of counsel), for appellant., Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, LLP, New York City (Robert I. Komitor of counsel), for respondent.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo Concur in Memorandum Judge Read Dissents and Votes to Reverse for the Reasons Stated in the Dissenting Memorandum at the Appellate Division (297 Ad2d 528, 529-531 [2002]).
Cited by 34 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

In this wrongful death action, plaintiff submitted sufficient proof in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment to create a triable issue of fact as to whether asbestos fibers manufactured by the defendant were supplied to decedent’s employer during his tenure there. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied under the relevant law of either New Jersey or New York.

[*648] Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur in memorandum; Judge Read dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (297 AD2d 528, 529-531 [2002]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.