State v. Borck, 221 P.3d 749 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). · Go Syfert
State v. Borck, 221 P.3d 749 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Russell Patrick BORCK, Defendant-Appellant.
CR050689 A134423.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Nov 25, 2009.
Published opinion
221 P.3d 749
2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1831
Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Jason E. Thompson, Salem and Ferder Casebeer French & Thompson, LLP, for petition.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion affirming his convictions on various crimes. State v. Borck, 230 Or.App. 619, 216 P.3d 915 (2009). Although we reject without discussion defendant's substantive contentions in support of his petition, we allow reconsideration for the limited purpose of modifying and correcting one aspect of our quotation of the trial court's operative ruling, as set out at 230 Or.App. at 629, 216 P.3d 915. Specifically, in the fourth paragraph of our quotation of the trial court's ruling, which begins "[The letters] do show * * *," the two references to "[M]" in that paragraph should, instead, read "[J]."

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.