Picray v. Sec'y of State, 936 P.2d 974 (Or. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Picray v. Sec'y of State, 936 P.2d 974 (Or. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David PICRAY, Respondent on Review,
v.
SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review.
CA A85293 SC S43537.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Apr 29, 1997.
Published opinion
936 P.2d 974
1997 Ore. LEXIS 34
Carson, C.J., and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber and Durham.
Published

Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER and DURHAM, JJ.[**]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court. The order of the Secretary of State is reversed.

[**] Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.