green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1914 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1914
1970
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Crick
(2×)
State v. Dougherty, Utah, 550 P.2d 175, 176-77 (1976); State v. Gillian, 23 Utah 2d 372, 374 , 463 P.2d 811, 812-13 (1970); State v. Hyams, 64 Utah 285, 287 , 230 P. 349 , 349- 50 (1924); State v. Mewhinney, 43 Utah 135, 154 , 134 P. 632, 639-40 (1913). (3) Here there was sufficient evidence to convict defendants of manslaughter, so they were entitled to an instruction on that lesser included offense.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. St. Clair
See State v. Mewhinney, 43 Utah 135 , 134 P. 632 , L.R.A.1916D, 590. 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Herrera
(2×)
See, e.g., Mewhinney, 134 P. at 638 (implementing insanity test requiring defendant to recognize wrongfulness of conduct); State v. Brown, 36 Utah 46 , 102 P. 641 (1909) (recognizing that an individual could have the necessary mens rea but not be criminally culpable due to insanity).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DALL
v.
STATE
v.
STATE
No. 2384.
Utah Supreme Court.
Apr 28, 1913.
A. B. Barms, Attorney-General, H. V. Higgins and George-0. Buckle, Assistant Attorneys-General, and J. W. Gherry-for appellants., Bates & Magleby for respondent.
Frick, McCarty, Straup.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
FRICK, J.
This case was tried in connection with the preceding case; and, with the exception of the ownership' of the land and the amount of damages, the pleadings, the evidence and judgment are the same as in the preceding one. The decision-is therefore controlled by the one in that case. For the reasons there stated, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court, with directions to set aside-the judgment and to dismiss the ease. Appellants to recover costs.
McCARTY, C. J., and STRAUP, J., concur.