cited Cited "see" United States v. Manning See Hoffman, 116 P.3d at 1001-02 .

examined Cited "see" State v. Auld (3×) Accord State v. Fields, No. 25455, ___ Hawai`i ___, ___ P.3d ___, ___, n. 7, 2005 WL 1274539 , at 19 n. 7 (App. May 31, 2005) ("Now that this duty [to properly instruct the jury] has been imposed on the trial court, it is logical to conclude that erroneous instructions should be examined for HRPP Rule 52(a) `harmless error' rather than HRPP Rule 52(b) `plain error.'"), cert. granted 108 Hawai`i 1, 116 P.3d 7 (Haw.

examined Cited "see" State v. Nichols (3×) Accord State v. Fields, No. 25455, — Hawai'i—, — P.3d—,—, n. 7, 2005 WL 1274539 , at *19 n. 7 (App. May 31, 2005) (“Now that this duty [to properly instruct the jury] has been imposed on the trial court, it is logical to conclude that erroneous instructions should be examined for HRPP Rule 52(a) ‘harmless error’ rather than HRPP Rule 52(b) ‘plain error.’ ”), cert. granted 108 Hawai'i 1 , 116 P.3d 7 (Haw.